Research On Judicial Cognizance Of Crime Of Intentional Destruction Of Property And Crime Of Fraud

With the development of economy,the manifestations of crimes against property are various and the means are complex,and the new cases have the particularity of The Times,which leads to the wave of discussion in judicial practice.Based on the case of pan,this paper analyzes the relevant theories and hopes that such cases can be accurately applied in judicial practice.Although China's criminal law has clear provisions on crimes against property,there are still some cognitions in judicial practice that are unable to provide clear legal guidance.In addition,the gap between the abstractness of theoretical basis and the concretization of practical experience leads to the differences between crime and non-crime,this crime and that crime.This paper starts from the basic case to refine the dispute focus of the case,analyze the divergent opinions,draw lessons from the existing theoretical research results and get their own thinking on the theory,the case for evaluation,progressive layer by layer so as to draw the analysis conclusion of this case.Using the basic principles of criminal law,put forward more perfect countermeasures.The full text is divided into four parts,a total of more than 20,000 words.The first part,introduction.This part includes the significance of the topic,research status,research methods.The second part,the case statement and the dispute focus.This part through the case for the case,the focus of the dispute.The dispute focus of this case is the crime of intentionally destroying property and the crime of extortion,fraud and theft.The third part,law application and case analysis.This part through to each dispute focal point carries on the analysis demonstration,the progressive analysis pan mou's behavior constitutes the conclusion which destroys the property crime intentionally.The fourth part,thinking and Suggestions.The lack of consistency in the identification of the new type of property crimes in judicial practice leads to the inaccuracy in conviction and sentencing.In view of the above problems,the author puts forward the thoughts and countermeasures of legal theory,judicial identification and improvement.