Research On The Legal Regulation Of China's Civil Aviation Monopoly

Civil aviation market has attracted much attention because of its special industrial characteristics and market structure.In recent years,under the background of the rapid development of international economy,many ICAOs have combined competition rules with domestic civil aviation industry in accordance with their national conditions to replace the control of administrative regulation on Civil Aviation market,thus stimulating the inherent potential of civil aviation market.From this point of view,the application of anti-monopoly law plays a vital role in the development of air transport industry,which also requires further liberalization and marketization of China's civil aviation market.For this reason,our country insists on proceeding from practice,and makes unremitting efforts in accordance with our own national conditions.For example,the reform of civil aviation system in 1987 and the approval of the Civil Aviation System Reform Program by the State Council in 2020.At the same time,in 2013,the National Development and Reform Commission clearly proposed that operators or trade associations in six major industries,including aviation,should focus on reaching price monopoly agreements and abusing market dominance.The abuse of administrative power to exclude and restrict the price monopoly of competition.However,according to the current situation of the civil aviation market in our country,the civil aviation market in our country is still unable to form a fair competition situation in practical sense due to the administrative monopoly of aviation and the dominant position of large enterprises themselves.In recent years,many civil disputes about civil aviation have pushed the monopoly of civil aviation market back to the forefront of public opinion.For example,in 2017,the United Airlines assault case caused widespread public opinion and had a greater impact on the public.But as early as 2014,China Eastern Airlines has been sued for overbooking.On the morning of May 15,2019,the case of passenger disputes caused by the overbooking of auspicious airline tickets has once again entered the public eye.Civil disputes about aviation occur frequently,which also arouses the author's thinking.Civil aviation industry is a service-oriented industry,but it can appear such a vicious case of "beating people" to infringe on the personal rights and interests of consumers,which has to cause people to question the real reason behind it.Firstly,this paper starts with such cases,from the superficial understanding of the case events to the in-depth excavation and puts forward reasonable inquiries,and analyses the possibility of the hidden civil aviation monopoly problem behind the repeated vicious incidents that infringe on the rights and interests of consumers,which have not been properly solved.Secondly,from the perspective of industrial economics,this paper makes an in-depth analysis of the fact that the price of air tickets in China's civil aviation market is on the high side of the same year,that private aviation enterprises are repeatedly frustrated,and that the complaint rate of passengers in civil aviation is constantly increasing.Combining theory with practice,this paper sums up the manifestations and reasons of monopoly in China's civil aviation market.The reliable data collected and investigated in practice confirm the authenticity and reliability of the author's opinions,and lay a solid factual foundation for the follow-up proposals on the legal regulation of civil aviation monopoly.Finally,through the horizontal and vertical comparative analysis of the process and fruitful results of the research on anti-monopoly law at home and abroad,and in full combination with the actual development of China's civil aviation market,this paper sums up the measures and measures to solve this problem in the context of the vigorous development of the market economy from the angles of the recognition standards of civil aviation monopoly behavior,the elimination of the impact of administrative monopoly,and fair competition review.Body suggestion.