Analysis On Technical And Tactical Statistics Of The 30 And The 31 National Badminton Olympic Champion

The current world of badminton men’s doubles competition has become increasingly fierce.Many countries in the world such as Malaysia,Japan,and South Korea have strong strength,especially after the retiring of a group of old Chinese players,which has brought tremendous challenges to the Chinese team.This article mainly studies the technical and tactical characteristics of the recent two men’s Olympic champions in China and their opponents,sums up the technical and tactical characteristics of the men’s doubles champion in China,and compares the characteristics and differences in the technical and tactical aspects of the men’s doubles.At the same time,through the comparison and analysis of the 30 th Olympic champions and the 31 st champions,as well as the skills and tactics of the 30 th champion Fu Haifeng and the 31 st champion Fu Haifeng,find out the characteristics of the technical tactics and the changing trends in different periods,and analyze Fu Haifeng’s With changes in skills and tactics after the age and physical decline,conclusions are drawn and corresponding reference opinions are given.This article analyzes and researches Olympic champions and their opponents through video statistics,logic analysis and other methods to draw the following conclusions:1.The Olympic champion’s serve court is mainly in No.1 and No.5 areas,which is stronger than the opponent’s serve and has less errors.The 30 th Champion Cai Yun Fu Haifeng and the 30 th Champion Fu Haifeng are more balanced than the 31 st Champion Zhang Nan Fu Haifeng and the 31 st Champion Fu Haifeng.In the receive,the delivery of Olympic champions focuses on the frontcourt and midfield,and missed the serve.The rate is less than the opponent,and the receiving technique is mainly pushing the ball.2.In terms of the impact of the placement of the tee on the third beat,the Olympic champion will have a better advantage than the opponent in sending the ball in the front court.The 30 th Champion Cai Wei Fu Haifeng took the initiative to maintain initiative and score ability,when the 31 st champion Zhang Nan Fu Haifeng received passive,passive transition,strong defensive counterattack ability.3.In terms of the effect of the third beat,the third beat of the Olympic champion is the most active.The 31 st champion Fu Haifeng’s third shot has an advantage.4.With regard to the use of technology in the whole field,the Olympic Champion is dominated by pushing and lifting the ball in the frontcourt,mainly in the midfield is drive,and mainly in the backcourt is smash.The ratio of the 31 st champion Fu Haifeng to the 30 th champion smash skill has dropped,and the proportion of frontcourt technology has increased.31 st champion Zhang Nan Fu Haifeng increased the proportion of technical use in the frontcourt over the 30 th session.5.In terms of scores,the Olympic champions scored the most in the active state,and scored the most in the frontcourt.The main technical backcourt was the smash.The main scoring section was between 1-5 shots.The 30 th champion Cai Yun and Fu Haifeng were more compared to the 31 champion Zhang Nan and Fu Haifeng.On the smash technology;31th champion Fu Haifeng than the 30 th champion Fu Haifeng in the scoring area on the front field more,less backcourt.Scored technically less backcourt skills,especially about smash.6.In terms of points of disappointment,the passive state of Olympic champions loses most points.The loser is mainly in the midfield.The technique is mainly drive.The main paragraphs are 1-5;the 31 st champion Zhang Nan Fu Haifeng is more than 13 beats than the 30 th champion Cai Yun Fu Haifeng Less points,more points in other paragraphs.Passive and active states lose less points,and others lose more points;the 30 th champion Fu Haifeng has more points than active and passive states at the 31 st session,and the general state is less.