Comparative Study On National Documents For National Fitness In China And The United States

This article is based on the comparison of the national-level national fitness documents between China and the United States,and documents,documents,and comparative analysis the promulgation background,development process,research and promulgation departments,content structure,and overall goals of national-level document policies for national fitness in both China and the United States.,strategic objectives,implementation targets and implementation strategies and other aspects of comparative analysis and combing.Concluded as follow:(1)There is a big difference in the development and promulgation environment of national-level documents for national fitness in China and the United States.In terms of policy environment,there is no sport law at the time when China studies and promulgates a national fitness plan,and internationally related mass sports policies are rare;at that time,the US sports laws and regulations were basically sound,and internationally there were even more World Health Organization and disease prevention.The control center has recommended the plan content for each country.In terms of the economic environment,China is pursuing a higher level of happiness in life.The United States is an unhealthy lifestyle for the people that has seriously affected national health and national fiscal expenditures.In terms of the social environment,China is experiencing rapid development of competitive sports,the sports industry has begun to rise,and the national sports atmosphere is rising;the development of mass sports in the United States has encountered bottlenecks.(2)The national-level documents for national fitness in China and the United States differ greatly in the formulation of seminars.There are substantial differences between the national fitness plan development departments and the promulgation departments of the two countries.In China,the government departments are solely responsible for the development and promulgation of the national fitness program,while the United States is the government-led non-governmental sector in the development and promulgation of the national fitness program.Compared with the United States,China has not solicited the views of the public during the study.The cycle of development of the China National Fitness Program is shorter,the cycle of the American National Fitness Program is longer,and the degree of government intervention is relatively small.(3)There is a big difference in the contents of national-level national fitness documents between China and the United States.The national fitness goal set by China emphasizes the intervention of public sports through policies,while the United States places more emphasis on the participation of all citizens in the process of sports participation.The proportion of policy interventions is very small.Judging from the implementation target of the plan,the implementation target of the U.S.National Fitness Program is more detailed and comprehensive,while China is relatively general.China's national fitness plan has a specific time for completion,but this concrete and unambiguous time cannot be seen in the United States' national fitness plan.From the concrete content of the plan,the content of China's national fitness program is more macroscopic,and the US plan is more specific and detailed.(4)There are significant differences in the implementation strategies of national-level national fitness documents between China and the United States.In terms of work measures,the United States has made clear plans and requirements in terms of theoretical research and upgrading of fitness equipment.In terms of safeguards,China encourages enterprises and private donations,while the United States promotes the development of national fitness through corporate laws and regulations.The level of development of China's assessment technology is still far behind that of the United States.The US policy evaluation system is more scientific and detailed.There are significant differences between the two countries in the main body of the implementation of the national fitness program.The municipal government of China leads the government in the lead,while the United States leads the government in leading departments and social organizations,and in the implementation of specific policies,the two countries have demonstrated Organization management features are also different.