Research On The Influence Of Freedom Of Expression On Judicial Trials In The Self-media Era

The 21st century is an era in which everyone mentions "Internet+".The rapid rise of the media has met people's need for real-time information interaction.Various network information exchange platforms such as Weibo,WeChat,and Forum have made various groups relatively in an information-equivalent position.The first part of this paper introduces the extension and development of freedom of expression in the era of media.At the same time,there is an inevitable pursuit of procedural justice and substantive justice in judicial trial.Actually,The freedom of public expression has brought positive and negative effects to the judicial trial.It is not single.The freedom of public expression and the identity and difference between judicial trials coexist.The influence of differences on judicial trials has two sides.Under such "speech pressure",what effect will it have on judicial trials?How this influence is reflected in the trial process and the outcome of the referee,has attracted much attention from the academic and practical circles,and has certain research space and research significance.The second part of this paper explores the internal relationship between freedom of expression and judicial trial in the era of media by analyzing the jurisprudence and rationality of the public's right to freedom of expression in judicial trials.Through the analysis of the identity and difference between the freedom of public expression and the judicial trial,the unity of the opposition of the public's freedom of expression to the judicial trial is revealed.The third part combs many hotspot cases in recent years,and uses empirical analysis to show the positive guiding effect and reverse interference effect of freedom of expression in different judicial trials from the media era.The public enters case information and multi-element deconstruction from the media environment,and then freely exports information through self-understanding and digestion,whether in the judicial process,in the factual identification,legal application,whether in the same case or in different cases.There is room for positive guidance and interference with judicial trials.The positive and negative effects of freedom of expression are interwoven in the trial process of each hot case and have a profound impact on legislation.It is a common aspiration of the academic and practical circles to exert the positive role of freedom of expression in judicial trials and weaken negative effects.The fourth part is about the construction of the relationship between the right to freedom of public expression and the judicial power in the era of media.Based on the analysis of the mechanism of the influence of freedom of expression and judicial trial in the previous section,explore the full play of the promotion role of freedom of expression in various trials,avoid the path of negative influence,and establish a harmonious relationship between freedom of expression and judicial judgment.