Factor Analysis Of The Income Gap Between Urban And Rural Residents Under The Impact Of Financial Crisis

This paper attempts to understand the relationship between the financial crisis and the urban-rural income gap by studying the channels and mechanisms of the impact of variables on urban-rural income gaps in the financial crisis,and the traditional financial crisis theory on urban-rural income gaps.I hope that when the government faces the financial crisis,it will give some reference when formulating relevant rescue policies,and help the government to consider its policy consequences.On the premise of using provincial panel data,this paper draws on the relevant research methods and builds a panel autoregressive model to explore how the relevant domestic macro variables affect the urban-rural income gap under the background of financial crisis;by discussing unemployment rate and society The changes in total investment,fiscal expenditure,and financial credits analyze how these variables affect the urban-rural income gap in a longer time dimension.In the empirical research process,based on the relevant theories,this paper uses panel autoregressive method to observe how the above four factors affect the urban-rural income gap and whether their influence has obvious time in a long period of time.Stagnation.The findings and conclusions of this study will help decision makers make targeted rescue decisions in the face of financial external shocks,and prompt decision makers to focus on the current effects of decision-making,and should also focus on a longer time dimension.Possible sequelae of policies to implement rational policy decisions.The results of this paper can draw the conclusion that in the short term,fiscal expenditure and total social investment are negative for urban-rural income gap,while unemployment rate and financial credit scale play a positive role in urban-rural income gap.In a long period of time,the effect of fiscal expenditure on the urban-rural income gap will be reduced from the original fiscal expenditure to the urban-rural income gap to the expansion of the urban-rural income gap.For the total amount of social investment,it can narrow the income gap between urban and rural areas in the short term,and in the long run,it also has the effect of further expanding the urban-rural income gap as with fiscal expenditure.This proves that in the face of the financial crisis,blindly adopting the practice of expanding fiscal expenditure and strengthening the total amount of social investment will not work.They have obvious effects of stabilizing the economic situation and reducing the income gap between urban and rural areas in the short term,but in the long run.There is a clear sequelae;and the role of financial credit scale for the urban-rural income gap has been positive,indicating that the increase in the distribution of credit resources in the face of the crisis,although conducive to boosting the economy,will significantly increase the urban-rural income gap.