This thesis critically examines the strict regulations of Chicana feminist theory and the constraints that it places on its followers/participants, preventing them from embracing a holistic identity. In addition to exposing these limitations, I explore possible solutions to overcoming these barriers. As recent research indicates, most Chicana feminist theory is based on nationalistic presuppositions, which require constructing an identity dependent on essentialist notions. Chicana feminist theory empowers Chicanas (in the beginning) because it helps Chicanas re-claim a heritage, language, and culture that is often stereotyped or devalued in mainstream society. Yet the step after this reclaiming can be problematic, for after a woman is a "Chicana," all other identities become sub-identities. Chicana feminist theory must move beyond claiming a voice, language, culture, and ethnic pride. Through this thesis, I propose a theory of love, which will facilitate Chicana feminism's expansion into a more inclusive theory. |