Fast and slow active control of combustion instabilities in liquid-fueled combustors

This thesis describes an experimental investigation of two different novel active control approaches that are employed to suppress combustion instabilities in liquid-fueled combustors. A “fast” active controller requires continuous modulation of the fuel injection rate at the frequency of the instability with proper phase and gain. Use of developed optical tools reveals that the “fast” active control system suppresses the instability by changing the nearly flat distribution of the phase between pressure and heat release oscillations to a gradually varying phase distribution, thus dividing the combustion zone into regions that alternately damp and drive combustor oscillations. The effects of these driving/damping regions tend to counter one another, which result in significant damping of the unstable oscillations. In contrast, a “slow” active controller operates at a rate commensurate with that at which operating conditions change during combustor operation. Consequently, “slow” controllers need infrequent activation in response to changes in engine operating conditions to assure stable operation at all times. Using two types of fuel injectors that can produce large controllable variation of fuel spray properties, it is shown that by changing the spray characteristics it is possible to significantly damp combustion instabilities. Similar to the aforementioned result of the “fast” active control study, “slow” change of the fuel spray properties also modifies the nearly flat phase distribution during unstable operation to a gradually varying phase distribution, resulting in combustor “stabilization”. Furthermore, deconvolutions of CH*-chemiluminescence images reveal the presence of vortex-flame interaction during unstable operation. Strong driving of instabilities occurs where the mean axial velocity of the flow is approximately zero, a short distance downstream of the flame holder where a significant fraction of the fuel burns in phase with the pressure oscillations.; It is shown that the “fast” and “slow” active control approaches suppress combustion instabilities in a different manner. Nevertheless, the both control approaches successfully suppress combustion instabilities by modifying the temporal and spatial behavior of the combustion process heat release that is responsible for driving the instability.