| The thesis considers the architectural implications of a new understanding of social space as porous space. This paradigm sees social space not as a homogenous, abstract and passive entity, but as heterogeneous, porous and active through democratic participation. This examination draws parallels between porosity and Canada's participatory democracy. A critical appraisal of the Bauhaus ideology, as a historical precedent and a survey of other institutes of design, as case studies elucidates the functioning, possibility and need for such an institute. This in conjunction with a discussion of Henri Lefebvre's notions of social space and George Parkin Grant's views on Canadian democracy forms a framework for the Canadian Institute of Design. The porous architecture of the Canadian Institute of Design demonstrates the possibility of creating a social and democratic environment. The Canadian Institute of Design sets the national agenda for the role of design in its social, political, cultural and creative contexts. It affirms the strategic importance of building and promoting national awareness and consciousness about design. |
