| Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations can offer a detailed view of the complex flow fields within an axial compressor and greatly aid the design process. However, the desire for quick turnaround times raises the question of how exact the model must be.;At design conditions, steady CFD simulating an isolated blade row can accurately predict the performance of a rotor. However, as a compressor is throttled and mass flow rate decreased, axial flow becomes weaker making the capturing of unsteadiness, wakes, or other flow features more important. The unsteadiness of the tip clearance flow and upstream blade wake can have a significant impact on a rotor.;At off-design conditions, time-accurate simulations or modeling multiple blade rows can become necessary in order to receive accurate performance predictions. Unsteady and multi- bladerow simulations are computationally expensive, especially when used in conjunction. It is important to understand which features are important to model in order to accurately capture a compressor's performance.;CFD simulations of a transonic axial compressor throttling from the design point to stall are presented. The importance of capturing the unsteadiness of the rotor tip clearance flow versus capturing upstream blade-row interactions is examined through steady and unsteady, single- and multi-bladerow computations. It is shown that there are significant differences at near stall conditions between the different types of simulations. |
