| Arsenic exists here and there,once the concentration in water exceeds a certain range,it will pose a huge threat to ecology and human health.Therefore,how to efficiently remove arsenic from aqueous solutions is particularly important.However,the treatment effect of single adsorbent on arsenic is limited,especially for As(Ⅲ).This paper takes advantage of Fe2O3 onto the surface of metal-organic framework materials(MOFs)to overcome the shortcomings of easy agglomeration.Three types of functional materials were designed to explore the relationship between material structures and removal of arsenic.The relationship between the internal adsorption mechanism is revealed by XRD,SEM,EDS,FT-IR,the details mainly as follows:(1)Similar deprotonated"phenol"materials,it was studying the treatment of arsenic in aqueous solution by MOF-74,MOF-74@Fe2O3,UTSA-74,UTSA-74@Fe2O3.The results showed that the removal of As(Ⅲ)forms were all H2AsO3-;The removal of As(Ⅴ)forms on MOF-74,UTSA-74,MOF-74@Fe2O3 were H2AsO4-,and UTSA-74@Fe2O3 was HAsO42-.After comparison,the series of MOF-74 could remove As(Ⅲ)faster,while UTSA-74 removed As(Ⅴ)faster.They were both in line with pseudo-second-order kinetics.Except for UTSA series materials,the removal of arsenic by other materials conformed to the Langmuir isotherm adsorption model,and it was more inclined to single-layer chemical adsorption.The XRD of the material before and after adsorption was unchanged,indicating that the material had a certain stability.The FT-IR showed that when MOF-74 adsorbed As(Ⅲ),the vibration peak appeared at 883cm-1.A vibration peak appeared at a wavenumber of 881 cm-1 when adsorbed As(Ⅴ),which may be the formation of the Zn-O-Asbond,which promoted the adsorption experiment.UTSA-74 also formed Zn-O-Asbonds after adsorbing As(Ⅲ)and As(Ⅴ).The specific positions were at 680 cm-1 and 660 cm-1,respectively.When two types of materials were loaded with Fe2O3,the vibrational peak of arsenic adsorption shifted slightly.It can be obtained that MOF-74 series are more suitable for quickly removing As(Ⅲ)from the environment,and UTSA-74 series materials are more suitable for As(Ⅴ).(2)Larger pores and more deprotonated"phenol"materials.It was researched that the effect of Zn2(olz)and Zn2(olz)@Fe2O3 on As(Ⅴ).Compared the materials with and without Fe2O3 loading,the corresponding instruments and equipment were used to characterize the materials before and after adsorption,to explore the adsorption mechanism.The results showed that the type of materials were mainly used for the removal of As(Ⅴ),and the form of arsenic adsorbed is HAsO42-.After loading Fe2O3,the adsorption time of arsenic by material was shortened,and the qe increased.Among them,Zn2(olz)and Zn2(olz)@Fe2O3 adsorbed arsenic and generated Zn-O-As bonds at830 cm-1 and 862 cm-1,respectively.When Fe2O3 on the surface of Zn2(olz),it could improve the adsorption performance of Zn2(olz)and promote the hydrolysis to achieve the purpose of synergistic removal of As(Ⅴ).(3)Protonated"phenol"materials,It was realized that the effects of UiO-66(OH)@Fe2O3 and UiO-66(OH)2@Fe2O3 on arsenic treatment and used different methods and formulas fitting to reveal the adsorption mechanism to lay the theoretical foundation for the design of new materials.The results showed that the efficiency of removal of As(Ⅴ)by UiO-66(OH)@Fe2O3was higher than UiO-66(OH)2@Fe2O3.The removal of As was HAsO42-;UiO-66(OH)2@Fe2O3 was more efficient to removing H2AsO3-.The removal of arsenic satisfied quasi-second-order kinetics and Langmuir isothermal adsorption model,thenΔG<0,indicating that the performance satisfied monolayer chemical adsorption and the reaction proceeded spontaneously.When UiO-66(OH)@Fe2O3 adsorbed As(Ⅲ),a small peak existed at 805 cm-1;when it adsorbed As(Ⅴ),a small vibration peak occurred at a wavenumber of 810 cm-1.It may be the Zr-O-As bond formed after the material adsorbs arsenic.Zr-O-Asbonds also appeared at822 cm-1 and 828 cm-1 for UiO-66(OH)2@Fe2O3 after arsenic adsorption.For UiO-66(OH)@Fe2O3 materials with low hydroxyl content and high protonation in the material,it is suitable for removing HAsO42-,and UiO-66(OH)2@Fe2O3 is more suitable for removing H2AsO3-.Selecting different materials for different forms of arsenic in the environment can achieve the purpose of efficient pollutant removal. |