Font Size: a A A

One Year Follow-up Study Of COVID-19 Patients After Discharge

Posted on:2022-11-07Degree:MasterType:Thesis
Country:ChinaCandidate:C Z JinFull Text:PDF
GTID:2494306779480704Subject:Digestive System Disease
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
Objective:Follow-up of clinical characteristics,chest imaging,lung function,hematocyte factors and antibodies 1 year after discharge of COVID-19 patients to improve the understanding of long-term outcomes of COVID-19 patients and identify factors that predict disease outcomes.Methods:Follow-up Of 43 local discharged COVID-19 patients admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College from January 28 to March 14,2020.Follow-up data of 28 patients with COVID-19 1 year after discharge were analyzed,including those who could not complete the follow-up study due to lost follow-up,inability to return visit due to illness,and refusal to join the study were excluded.According to the difference in lung inflammation absorption of covid-19 patients who were followed up one year after discharge(CT quantitative analysis),they were divided into two groups: good absorption group(group A: 12 patients in this group were completely absorbed)and poor absorption group(group B: 16 patients in this group still had some residual lung lesions).T-test or χ 2.The epidemiological characteristics,accompanying basic diseases,symptoms,biochemical indicators,cytokines,antibodies,imaging and pulmonary function were analyzed.Results:Twenty of the 28 recovered COVID-19 patients(71.43)were from the severe group,of which 14 were distributed in the malabsorption group [A 6/12(50.00%)vs B14/16(87.50%),P < 0.05].Among the 28 patients,1 patient had obvious sequelae 1 year after acute infection,and 7 patients(25.00%)had impaired lung function(6 patients from group B and 1 patient from group A).All patients had residual lung lesions at discharge,but the difference between groups was not statistically significant(P>0.05).At the last follow-up,the total volume of residual lung lesions in group B was higher than that in group A [A(0.00±0.00)vs B(14.54±22.51),P < 0.05].The D-Dimer of patients in both groups remained at A high level during the follow-up period,and there was A significant difference between the two groups at discharge [A(0.72±0.57)vs B(2.57±1.28),P < 0.05].At the last follow-up,there was still difference between the two groups [A(0.82±0.68)vs B(3.01±1.53),P < 0.05].PCT of procalcitonin [A(1.10±0.28)vs B(2.55±1.29),P < 0.05] and CRP of C-reactive protein [A(1.10±0.28)vs B(2.55±1.29),P < 0.05] were significantly different between the two groups at discharge.During the follow-up,CRP and PCT decreased gradually,and returned to normal level at the last follow-up.There was no difference between CRP and PCT groups at each follow-up node(P>0.05).The serum levels of 24 cytokines were decreased during the follow-up,but there was no significant difference between groups(P>0.05).The positive rate of Ig G antibody in group A was 91.67% at discharge and 100.00% at 30 days.The positive rate of group B fluctuated 87.50-100.00% during the 1-year followup.Ig M antibody positive rate decreased gradually from 83.33%(at discharge)to 0.00%(at 1-year follow-up)in group A and from 75.00%(at discharge)to 12.50%(at 1-year follow-up)in group B.There was no significant difference in Ig G/Ig M antibody positive rate between the two groups at each follow-up node(P>0.05).Conclusion:In the convalescence period,the symptoms of COVID-19 patients were mild,cytokines and most biochemical indicators returned to normal,Ig G antibody titer continues to rise,and a few patients had residual lesions in imaging,lung function injury,and d-D dimer high,which may be related to the abnormal immune function of patients,and the long-term prognosis needs further follow-up.
Keywords/Search Tags:COVID-19, The prognosis, Follow-up
PDF Full Text Request
Related items