Reading Deleuze

The theories of Ranciere and Deleuze have a strong internal relevance.They both cover a wide range of fields,spanning literature,film,and aesthetics,and each proposed a series of distinctive concepts,such as generation,disagreement etc.Ranciere has interpreted and commented on Deleuze’s theory many times in his works.These comments are not only his research on Deleuze,but also show a strong tendency of equality and democracy in his own thought.Therefore,discussing Ranciere’s research on Deleuze will help us to grasp the ideological context of Ranciere and Deleuze more clearly.This article combs Ranciere’s evaluation and analysis of Deleuze’s theory from three perspectives:literature,film and aesthetics.In the field of literature,Ranciere cited Deleuze’s generative concept in his textual analysis of Flaubert.Both Ranciere and Deleuze broke and reorganized the concept of literary ontology,and worked on theoretical construction and The text analysis shows a strong tendency to practice politics.In the field of film,Ranciere criticized Deleuze’s distinction between motion-image and time-image,and believed that the two images differ only in features and perspectives,rather than being completely distinguished in the sense of noumenon.On the one hand,Ranciere neglected the relationship between film and fable in his critique of Deleuze,interpreting the relationship between image and image as the relationship between image and fable.In the field of aesthetics,Ranciere believes that Deleuze’s concept of"imperceptible" is to lead politics to nothingness.This article points out that Ranciere’s concept of perceptual distribution and Deleuze’s "being-insensible" are both similar to Kant.The concept of "common sense"of Deleuze has a strong internal relevance.Deleuze’s sense of commonality emphasizes universal communicability and demonstrates the difference achieved from the generation of the ontology.Ranciere emphasizes the importance of each individual’s Sharing the differences contained in aesthetic judgments,both emphasize the disintegration of the existing perceptual order.Therefore,in this sense,the two have a strong commonality in aesthetics.