A Study On Aesthetic Anthropology Criticism

In the context of globalization and modernization,the traditional humanities are increasingly facing challenges and the trend of interdisciplinary research is becoming more and more obvious.Aesthetic anthropology emerges at the historic moment and attracts more and more attention from the academic circle.Aesthetic anthropology is an interdisciplinary subject,emphasizing the combination of theory and practice.Aesthetic anthropological criticism is to use aesthetic anthropological theory to explain aesthetic cultural phenomena.Aesthetic anthropology criticism links the theory and practice of aesthetic anthropology and plays a role of bridge and link.In the introduction part of the paper,on the basis of discussing the source and background of the topic,the research status is summarized and evaluated,and the purpose and significance of the research is elucidated.The main body of the thesis forms the structure frame and main content by four parts.The first part discusses the connotation and object of aesthetic anthropology criticism.The interpretation of the critical connotation of aesthetic anthropology is based on the study of aesthetic anthropology.Under the background of crisis and challenge of aesthetics,the combination of anthropology and aesthetics makes aesthetic anthropology a new discipline to be constructed,and produces a new academic growth point under the interdisciplinary background.The objects of aesthetic anthropology criticism mainly include local aesthetic cultural phenomena minority ethnic aesthetic cultural phenomena and daily life aesthetic cultural phenomena.The span of time and the span of space constitute different critical horizons and the interpretation of any cultural or aesthetic phenomenon cannot be separated from the specific historical context.The second part summarizes the theoretical basis and methods of aesthetic anthropological criticism.Aesthetic anthropology criticism belongs to aesthetic anthropology,so aesthetic anthropology criticism benefits from the rich theoretical basis of aesthetic anthropology,which mainly includes the theory of contextualism,the theory of local knowledge and local aesthetic experience,and the theory of aesthetic system.The critical methods of aesthetic anthropology are different from the research methods of aesthetic anthropology.The critical methods point to concrete and operable methods,including detailed description and deep description,participation method and observation method,text interpretation method and so on.The research methods of aesthetic anthropology include the unification of history and logic,interdisciplinary research method and cross-cultural comparison method.The third part explains the function and value orientation of aesthetic anthropology criticism.The functions of aesthetic anthropology criticism include evaluation,guidance and aesthetic education.The function of aesthetic anthropology criticism ultimately points to aesthetics and aesthetic people.The value orientation of aesthetic anthropology criticism includes the value orientation of "patriarchal nature",and its corresponding criticism standard is "truth";"People-oriented" value orientation,its more critical standard is "good";The value orientation of "taking harmony as beauty",its corresponding criticism standard is "beauty".The fourth part focuses on the practical application of aesthetic anthropology criticism.Take "Rongshui Miao series Pohui Group" and "Nanning International Folk Song Art Festival" as examples for in-depth study.On the basis of the three methods of aesthetic anthropology proposed by Wilfrid van Dam--empirical research,contextualism and cross-cultural research,this paper explains and analyzes two specific cases.On the one hand,the theoretical value of aesthetic anthropology criticism is embodied in the supplement and construction of the theoretical basis of aesthetic anthropology,on the other hand,it provides the possibility of theoretical innovation for the critics.The realistic significance of aesthetic anthropological criticism lies in its value-oriented role in the development of current humanities and cultural trend,and in improving the academic and theoretical self-confidence of our nation and the cultural self-confidence of marginalized ethnic groups.The theoretical system and critical practice of aesthetic anthropology are still in the process of construction and need to deepen and expand the research space.Currently,aesthetic anthropology theory and the practice is still on,China as a multi-ethnic country with the research of aesthetic anthropology,aesthetic anthropology theory is a new era of cultural confidence and theory of socialism with Chinese characteristics specific practice,criticism and aesthetic anthropology research to a certain extent,also set up the theory of cultural self-confidence and self-confidence,Thus promoting the development of contemporary Chinese aesthetic anthropology theory.