On Discussion Of False Self-admission

False self-admission,is recognized by the other party in the civil litigation process,the parties made a self-defeating proposition and would infringe on the interests of others or the public interest of false meaning.The false self-admission With the help of the admission system,making a false self-admission rule out the effectiveness of the right to the factual findings of the Court,our judicial authority,justice and the legitimate interests of the third party caused serious damage.Our academic on false self-admission studied enough depth,but also the lack of regulatory approach of the judicial practice in the false admission in judicial practice there falsely consider themselves the difficult regulatory issues.Based on this,we tried to consider themselves the nature and consider themselves the effectiveness of the theoretical basis starting clarify the theoretical basis of false consider themselves consider themselves the effectiveness of compliance from the source,and to propose solutions for the many problems that exist in the judicial practice effectively,thereby from the fundamental solution to the problem of false self-admission.This article is about thirty thousand words,divided into an introduction,body and conclusion of three parts.In the text is divided into five chapters,as follows:In the first part,I experienced a case of false self-admission for the admission problem leads to false and false self-admission concept and its characteristics were analyzed,and the false self-admission with false litigation related concepts to discriminate,initially propose false claim to the problem.The second part of a comprehensive analysis of the false self-identified parent-admission system,starting from the concept of self-confessed,clarifying consider themselves the nature of the differences clearly consider themselves the nature of the litigation behavior;addition,clear admission the validity and effectiveness of implementation aspects,and pointed out that the theoretical basis that consider themselves to be effective for both the parties and the court debate doctrine.The third part of the second part of the conclusion as a basis for the theory associated with false self-admission visits,visits from the three perspectives of the debate doctrine based on elements of the commencement of litigation behavior and good faith principle.Through investigation,obtained false self-admission does not meet the debate ’according to elements of effective litigation actions and false self-admission is also contrary to the principle of good faith.Based on this,draw a false self-admission should be subject to the conclusion of the regulation.The fourth section describes the status of our current false self-admission,and a detailed analysis of the causes of false self-admission problem,draw their main reasons include lack of misreading of the basic theory of the admission system and related systems.The fifth part of the sound of false self-admission problem a number of opinions,mainly including the detailed regulations on the the false self-admission behave,the legal consequences of the legislation,and the principle of good faith to further refine and improve.Meanwhile,the initial establishment of the admission matching system of the false self-admission recognition mechanism as well as false.False self-admission regulation in order to play a role.