| Fairness and justice have always been the goal of justice.Equal case equal treatment,different circumstances different treatment,equal application of the law to any case,this is the same case with the basic meaning of the sentence.However,in the judicial practice of the trial of civil cases in our country,the phenomenon of repeated different sentences in the same case seriously hinders the realization of the equal value of the law,violates the requirements of judicial justice,and is not conducive to the uniform application of the law.China is a country with written law,and the inherent limitations and lag of laws may lead to different judgements given by judges when hearing specific cases.In addition,there are many other reasons may lead to the phenomenon of different convictions in the same case.On the basis of previous studies,this paper will combine two typical civil cases,namely,the purchase of fake and the sale of murderous houses,to analyze the definition of the same sentence in civil cases,the demonstration of why the same sentence should be given,and the necessity of the same sentence in civil cases."Accomplice" here refers to "similar cases","with the sentence" refers to "the same or similar judgment’,from the form justice,judicial predictability and coherent,demonstrates the connection with the necessity of the sentence,analyses the causes of formation of different connection with the given in the end,in view of the problems put forward the coping strategies,targeted to improve the class formation and retrieval mechanism,Including optimizing the selection mechanism of guiding cases,improving the case compilation mechanism,and improving the technology of case research;Standardize the application of judges’ cases,including clarifying the premise and method of application of judges’ cases,and strengthen the professional quality of judges;We will strengthen supervision and management over trials of such cases. |