| In recent years,it is more and more common for public road managers to be held accountable in the cases of obstruction of passage-caused disputes.The law of our country stipulates the duty of cleaning,protecting and warning the road under its jurisdiction,and the “Civil Code” also stipulates that if the road manager fails to prove that he has fulfilled the above obligations and causes damage to others,he shall bear corresponding responsibilities.But predictably,in the period of civil code,whether in theory or in the judicial practice of obstruction of traffic cause person damage public road managers how to bear the responsibility of dispute is not terminated,its liability still has many problems,such as public road management main body,and the constitutive requirements of justice in the form of liability identify problems such as confusion and problem existed.In this paper,literature research,case study and other methods are adopted.First of all,the main types and identification standards of public road managers are analyzed.Secondly,the judicial judgment of the elements of tort liability of public road managers are discussed respectively.Finally,based on the current laws and regulations,this paper analyzes the responsibility forms of road managers in different situations,and thinks that the responsibility forms mainly consider the factors of causation to judge and determine the responsibility forms. |