| The leniency system for confessing guilt and punishing is based on the actual conditions of our country,and is put forward on the basis of effectively drawing on the reasonable elements of plea bargaining.It is of great help in solving the problems of ‘personal conflict’ and ‘shortage of judicial resources’ in judicial practice.With the full implementation of the system,many practical problems that need to be resolved continue to be exposed.This article intends to incorporate the method of evidence-based law into legal research.Through empirical analysis,an evidence-based evaluation of the implementation effect of the leniency system for confession of guilt and punishment will be carried out.Based on the reflected problems,it puts forward evidence-based suggestions to improve the system of plea guilty and punishing leniency.In addition to the introduction and conclusion,this article mainly includes three parts:The first chapter ‘proposed the problem: the mission of pleading guilty and punishing leniency’.By expounding the current situation of criminal justice resources and the practical requirements for the urgent need for efficient allocation,the question of the realistic mission of the confession and punishment leniency system is put forward,and the meaning and attributes of the confession and punishment leniency system and its practical significance in the allocation of criminal justice resources are briefly discussed.The second chapter is ‘Evidence-based analysis of the effect of lenient confession of guilt and punishment’.Using the ‘digital network platform for legal information’,systematically retrieve relevant eligible cases and conduct categorized research on eligible cases,and then examine how the system of plea guilty and punishing leniency improves the quality and effectiveness of trials,implements the criminal justice policy of combining leniency and strictness,and protects the legitimate rights and interests of the parties And other aspects,to realize the evidence-based evaluation of the effect of lenient confession and punishment.Chapter Three is ‘Evidence-based Suggestions on the Improvement of the Leniency System for Pleading Guilty and Punishment’.Based on the judicial practice problems that existed in the implementation of the leniency system for confessing guilt and punishing,it is recommended to address the problems in the implementation process of the leniency system by revising the substantive law,clarifying the range of leniency,strengthening document reasoning and system protection,etc.Problems such as lack of uniform sentencing standards,inadequate interpretation of judgment documents,and insufficient efficiency in handling cases. |