| Let the majority of residents truly participate in community governance activities,is not only an important way for the people to widely participate in political life at the current stage,but also an effective way to effectively improve the level of community governance and strengthen community construction work.As the two core subjects of current community governance,the active participation of government and residents in community governance has played an important role that cannot be ignored.However,in the process of community governance,the government and residents play an unequal role.The government is more willing to push,and the residents themselves are a little less demanding.Existing research results and practical experience have proved that the problem of low enthusiasm of community residents to participate in community governance is common in China,which has also become an important factor limiting the further improvement of community governance level in China.With the acceleration of urbanization and the continuous increase in the number of urban residents,it is of great practical significance to study how to further stimulate and mobilize the enthusiasm of urban residents to participate in community governance for promoting the modernization of grass-roots democracy and governance capacity.As of the end of 2019,the number of urban communities in Bazhong City was 104,an increase of 13 compared with the end of 2018.With the continuous advancement of the strategy of urban-rural integration,"village to residence" and "rural revitalization",the number of urban communities in Bazhong will continue to increase,and there will be more and more contradictions and problems highlighted in community governance.Bazhong,as a representative of small and medium-sized cities,takes Bazhong’s urban residents’ participation in community governance as the research object,which is representative to some extent to the relevant research on urban community governance and residents’ participation in China.Firstly,this paper summarizes the background,significance and current situation of the research,and clarifies the basic concepts involved in the research process.Secondly,through combing the theoretical basis of public governance theory and citizen participation theory,the analysis framework of this paper is constructed.Finally using the method of questionnaire and statistics analysis,in the form of a questionnaire survey on the current stage in Bazhong city residents to participate in the basic status of community governance research,found in Bazhong city residents participate in community governance exist the main body of residents’ participation is unbalanced,the scope of residents’ participation is narrow,the level of residents’ participation is low and the willingness of residents’ participation is low.On the basis of the analytical framework,this paper makes a comprehensive analysis of the reasons why urban residents in Bazhong do not have high enthusiasm to participate in community governance.Firstly,the problems at the policy environment level include the conflict between the policy system and the actual operation,and the lack of institutional guarantee for residents’ participation.The second reason is the problem of governance object level,including the government and community rights and responsibilities are not clear,social organizations do not play a positive role;The third reason is the problems at the level of participants,including the lack of community sense of belonging,the lack of community public spirit and the lack of actual participation ability of residents.Based on the reference and draw lessons from the current stage of residents to participate in community governance at home and abroad on the basis of successful experience and lesson,This paper from the perfect community management system and improve the residents participation system,transform government functions and clear responsibilities,support the development of social organizations and personnel training,improve the residents’ participation consciousness and ability to participate in the four aspects put forward the corresponding countermeasures and Suggestions. |