The informatization of the world has promoted information disclosure,which can contribute to economic and social development and the realization of citizens’ rights and interests.At present,government information disclosure and citizens’ right to know have received due attention and strong protection,which is reflected in the extensive establishment of government information disclosure systems worldwide.Government agencies collect,store,and use citizens’ personal information through administrative functions,and disclose information items stipulated by laws and regulations when performing administrative functions.The "Regulations on Disclosure of Government Information"(revised in 2019)stipulate the methods,scope,and restrictions on the disclosure of government information,but it does not provide specific details on the protection of personal information,nor does it define relevant concepts.Therefore,how to coordinate government information disclosure and personal information protection is a realistic problem.Through a comprehensive analysis of cases in which information disclosure involves personal information in administrative litigation,this paper analyzes the judgments of administrative agencies and courts on the focus of disputes and procedures,and proposes countermeasures,hoping to provide personal opinions for government information disclosure and citizens’ personal information protection.This article includes the main text and the conclusion.The structure of the text is as follows: First,it introduces the basic theory of personal information litigation in government information disclosure in trial practice,including basic concepts and principles to follow.Secondly,it introduces the overall situation of personal information litigation cases,and has an in-depth understanding of the specific judgment methods of courts and administrative agencies in practice from the two aspects of dispute focus and procedures.Then,sort out the problems in the personal information litigation of government information disclosure in practice,that is,there are ambiguities in public interest measurement standards and personal privacy judgments.Thirdly,it introduces the legislation of personal information protection outside the territory,mainly introduces the status of personal information legislation in the European Union and the United States,and provides useful experience for my country’s personal information legislation.Finally,in the third part of the practice,there are three major problems in personal information litigation,and some suggestions are put forward based on the status quo. |