| The changes brought about by the era of big data have a profound impact on our lives.In the complex network environment,the value of data is becoming more and more prominent,and the supervision and processing of data is becoming more and more refined.Countries around the world are paying more and more attention to the protection of personal data.At the same time,the legislation also brings data subjects’ concerns and concerns about their own data.The "Personal Information Protection Law" promulgated and implemented in my country in 2021 makes comprehensive regulations on the collection,use,provision and deletion of personal information in a special legislative mode,and takes a step forward in solving the problem of vulnerability of personal information in my country’s network environment.A milestone step.Article 47 of the law establishes the right to delete personal information,allowing the information subject to request the personal information processor to delete personal information under specific circumstances,and require it to perform the deletion obligation according to the law.The right to deletion stipulated in the first paragraph of Article 47 actually stipulates the localized right to be forgotten-in the processing of personal information by natural persons,for those processing purposes that have been achieved,cannot be achieved or are no longer necessary If the personal information has not been actively deleted by the personal information processor,it has the right to request the personal information processor to delete the personal information.The relationship between the right to be forgotten and the right to erasure has always been concerned and discussed in the academic and practical circles.The right to be forgotten has a value attribute that is different from the right to erasure.It can expand the function of the right to erasure personal information,thereby making up for the right to erasure personal information.Existing flaws and deficiencies.Aware of this problem,this paper conducts in-depth research from different aspects in order to explore the localization path of the right to be forgotten in the network environment.The problem leads to the research purpose and significance of this paper—by introducing a limited right to be forgotten,it provides strong support for strengthening the protection of personal information.The second chapter mainly expounds the general situation of the right to be forgotten by introducing the concept,origin and justification basis of the right to be forgotten.The third chapter lists the difficulties faced by the localization of the right to be forgotten in my country’s network environment,and analyzes its causes.The fourth chapter,from the perspective of comparative law,compares and analyzes the legislative status and judicial practice of the right to be forgotten in the United States and Europe,draws relevant experience and deeply discusses the current achievements and challenges faced by my country in the legislation and practice of the right to be forgotten..Chapter 5 continues the summary and accumulation of extraterritorial legislative and judicial experience in the previous chapter,and proposes to set up a special personal information protection agency,strengthen technological innovation for data storage management,promote industry self-discipline,and attach importance to the protection of minors’ interests and quality education,etc.Relevant solutions are expected to be helpful to the resolution of issues related to the localization of the right to be forgotten. |