A Study Of The Characteristics Of The Loss Of Points By Medvedev,the 2019 ATP1000 Tennis Masters Single Champion In Shanghai

Medvedev won the Shanghai ATP1000 Masters Championship for the first time in 2019.In the previous Cincinnati Masters,Medvedev defeated Djokovic again in the semifinals and reached the Masters final back to back to win his career.The first Masters championship.As a young player,he has relatively good research value.Therefore,I will conduct statistical research and analysis on Medvedev’s scores in the five games of the Shanghai ATP1000 Masters in 2019,hoping to find out how Chinese male tennis players are playing.,Training and theory.This article uses literature data,video observation,mathematical statistics,and logical analysis to analyze Medvedev’s scores and losses in the Shanghai ATP1000 Masters in 2019,and conclude that Medvedev is in the game.Reflected in the score characteristics of the score,the following conclusions are drawn:(1)In terms of serving,Medvedev’s first serve scoring rate is generally higher than the first serve success rate.Although the second serve success rate is relatively high,the second serve scoring rate fluctuates greatly,and the stability is not enough;In terms of choice,he mainly serves from outside corners.From the perspective of overall win rate: outside corner>inner corner>center;in terms of direct scoring and losing points,Medvedev prefers to rely on a large-angle outside corner to score directly,and is forced.Lost points are the highest among direct points lost.(2)In terms of receiving and serving,the success rate of receiving a serve is lower than that of receiving a second serve,and the scoring rate of receiving a serve is generally lower than that of receiving a second serve.At the same time,Medvedev’s receiving point is based on the midfielder.Mainly,in terms of winning rate,the win rate of midfield and backcourt is not much different;in terms of direct scoring,the direct scoring rate of backcourt is generally higher than that of midfielder.In terms of direct scoring rate: frontcourt > Backfield> Midfield.(3)In terms of the hitting line of the serving game,Medvedev scored mainly through the diagonal line in the previous two rounds,accounting for 35.9% of the total score.The score in the stalemate stage accounted for a relatively small proportion,and the key points were also mainly diagonal.In terms of points loss,the proportion of straight points lost in the stalemate phase is the highest,while the midway points lost in the stalemate phase are the least.(4)In terms of the line of the receiving and serving rounds,Medvedev had the highest percentage of slash points in the previous two rounds,but the percentage of lost points was also the highest.Obviously,the slash scores of the receiving and serving rounds The efficiency drops and the rate of points lost is increasing;and in terms of points lost,the proportion of points lost in the stalemate phase is less than the proportion of the previous two rounds.(5)In terms of hitting technique and line,Medvedev’s forehand and backhand scores and losses are not much different,but there is a big difference in other technical scores.From the overall point of view,the backhand slash scoring rate is relatively stable,but the backhand straight line volatility is relatively large,and the difference in scores is relatively large.