A Comparative Analysis Of The Technical Utility And Regional Utility Of The World’s Best Badminton Men’s Singles Players

In recent years,the national feather men’s singles have not performed well in international competitions.On the one hand,the reason is that the technical level of the international men’s singles and the reserve talents of various countries are increasing.The research on the world’s outstanding men’s singles players cannot be delayed.In this paper,four outstanding badminton men’s singles players,Axelon,Momota Xianto,Jin Ting and Li Zijia,are counted by means of dartfish motion analysis software by means of literature,expert interviews,video observation,comparative analysis,mathematical statistics and other research methods.Technical information from the 12 matches against each other in the 2019-2021 major event.The badminton arena is divided into regions,and the player’s batting technique is used as the main breakthrough point of the research.First,the frequency of the player’s technical use is counted,and then the corresponding hitting effect of the athlete is counted,and the technical use frequency and the corresponding hitting effect are combined.The theoretical model that can quantitatively evaluate the decision-making behavior of athletes-utility function（including technical utility and regional utility）,and then compare and evaluate the hitting area and hitting technique of the players through a new utility analysis,in order to find out the different players using different techniques and techniques.The pros and cons of decision-making in different regions provide a reference for Chinese men’s singles athletes to prepare for a strong enemy.The main research conclusions are as follows:（1）Technical distribution characteristics: Excellent men’s singles players mainly use the backhand to serve the ball in front of the net in terms of serving technology,and choose positions 1 and 5 for landing,combined with a small amount of “stealing the backcourt” technology;The technique is mainly based on picking and rolling,and the frontcourt area is called the transition area;the midfield technique is mainly blocking the ball,and the midfield area is called the defensive area;the backcourt technique is mainly smashing,but there are certain The number of lobs and lobs,lobs and lobs also have certain attacking attributes,and the backcourt area is called the attacking area.（2）Regional distribution characteristics: In badminton competition,the hitting area of the players presents the frontcourt area > the backcourt area > the midfield area,and the hitting frequency gradually decreases.The midfield area acts as a defensive area and has the fewest hits;the frontcourt area acts as a transition area and hits the most;（3）Characteristics of points gained and lost: On the whole,outstanding men’s singles players have the highest number of points scored by their smashing technique in the backcourt area,and the highest scoring rate by their smashing technique in the frontcourt area;The ball technique,the highest error rate is the swipe technique in the midfield area.It can be seen that it is too one-sided to judge the regional utility and technical utility of the athlete only by the characteristics of the athlete’s gain and loss points.（4）Regional utility characteristics: Overall,the regional utility value of the outstanding men’s singles players in the backcourt area is the highest,and the regional utility value in the midfield area is the lowest,indicating that their comprehensive income in the backcourt area is the highest,and the comprehensive income in the midfield area worst.Comparing the four athletes,it is concluded that in the frontcourt area and the midfield area,Kento Momota has the highest regional utility value,which also reflects the best comprehensive income.In the backcourt area,Axelon has the highest regional utility value and the best comprehensive income;In the frontcourt area and the midfield area,Li Zijia has the lowest regional utility value,reflecting the worst comprehensive income.In the backcourt area,Taotian Xiandou has the lowest regional utility value and the worst comprehensive income.（5）Technical utility characteristics: On the whole,outstanding men’s singles players have the highest technical utility value of smashing technique and the lowest technical utility value of blocking technique,indicating that the comprehensive benefit of smashing technique is the highest,and the technical utility value of blocking technique is the lowest.Comparing the four athletes,it is concluded that the technical utility value of Ansailong’s smashing technique is the highest,reflecting the best comprehensive income;Li Zijia’s blocking technique has the lowest technical utility value,reflecting the worst comprehensive income.