Research On The Reasoning Problem Of Administrative Judgment Documents

With the rapid development of China's social economy,the diversification of employment methods and forms,the causes of work-related accidents tend to become more complex,coupled with the improvement of social labor security system,as well as the improvement of workers' awareness of the rule of law,resulting in an increase in the number of cases of work-related injury identification year by year.As the carrier of judicial decision,the adjudicative instrument which records the claims,evidence,reasons for work injury determination,results,compensation and so on is not only the embodiment of fairness and justice,but also the pursuit of the humanistic spirit and human rights value of the law.Therefore,in an administrative decision-making instrument of work injury determination,whether the judge's argument for the evidence of the case is clear and powerful,whether the dispute focus summary is accurate and in place,whether the reason for the reason of the judgment is clear and sufficient,whether the writing of the instrument is standardized,etc.are related to the audience of the judgment instrument,especially the acceptance and acceptance of the decision results of the parties,but also affect the final effect of the judicial decision.The industrial injury insurance system is the social security that each insured person legally enjoys,and each administrative decision instrument of work injury determination is related to the vital interests of the insured and even the dependence on survival,so through quantitative empirical analysis and research on the evidence,the focus of dispute,the reasons for the decision,the application of the law and other elements in the administrative judgment document of the work injury determination case,we can find the shortcomings and problems in the administrative judgment document of the work injury determination case,and use this as the basis,from the perspective of the work injury determination case.By following the writing norms,optimizing the argumentation and method of reasoning,constructing the quality standard system of reasoning,and promoting the multi-path of simple diversion to optimize the rationalization and writing of administrative adjudication instruments,it will help to guarantee the justice and authority of the judiciary,improve the acceptability of the judgment results,fully protect the legitimate rights and interests of the parties,and achieve good results of reasoning.