Evidence Analysis Of Zhou Mouqin's Intentional Homicide Case

This paper discusses a real case evidence.Some qin suspicion of intentional homicide case,investigators in handling process,the cognizance of that analysis of the evidence and the case facts had a great controversy,few investigators think the doubt and question,has no substantial evidence to the case that some qin intentional homicide evidence is sufficient,the case fact is clear,some qin's criminal responsibility shall be investigated,but most of the personnel involved in the case to handle,thinks that there are a lot of doubt,evidence and has not ruled out a reasonable doubt,so the claim cannot be considered some qin intentional homicide,not criminal investigation was carried out on the weekend khin.In the light of the objective conditions,the main evidence in the case that documented evidence has legitimacy,relevance,pointing to the weekend qin intentional homicide evidence of objective truth,some qin about the murder confession has the workability,not its poison murder confession of authenticity is insufficient,the investigators presented evidence to doubt,cannot be established,they examine evidence to judge,ruled that the evidence in doubt there are some errors,way of thinking and theoretical basis in violation of the basic experience and common sense,not some qin criminal responsibility shall be investigated for conclusions in violation of the case facts,does not conform to the law.After careful evidence analysis,the author thinks that Zhou Mou Qin should be investigated for its criminal responsibility for intentional homicide.Suspicious "the author believes that" the evidence,as often occurs in the practice of criminal justice of the criminal suspect or defendant from sin(SINS),one of the statutory basis should be taken seriously,in particular,to make a reliable evidence "doubt" itself,analyze and judge the correctness of the thinking and method of evidence is particularly important,the correctness of the authenticity of evidence judgment is particularly important,especially important to identify the case facts objectively accurate,so as to correctly do about right,not weaken the local criminal justice the basic function of punishment and crime prevention,unapt make social paradise "crime";Doubt "on the contrary,if the" evidence,"doubt" evidence itself and without(any)reasonable doubt,the fact is clear,but some investigators working experience is not enough,ability is low,level,for misjudgment,evidence of the fact that does not conform to the reality,then,"the evidence in doubt" will be misuse and abuse can lead to some shall be investigated for criminal responsibility should be "criminals" and ran away before the criminal law,this is not the correct meaning of "human rights" criminal justice and the normal state,but in a sense the infringement human rights,the general public is not subjected to criminal violations,access to safe and freedom of human rights.This paper argues that: each case of fairness and justice,are all based on each case workers review judgment evidence right,objective and accurate,to determine the case facts and the truth,even if not every case can achieve,but should be the unshakable goal,is our case should adhere to the direction of the ideal and the judicial value.