A Comparative Study Of Senior Middle School Physics Textbooks Based On The Physical Key Competencies

In 2017,the Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China has formulated the "Ordinary High School Physics Curriculum Standard",which officially proposed physical key competencies.Physical key competencie is a key ability and character that students have experienced after studying in school.The elements of studying in school have enforceers,admirers,and teaching materials.The textbook is an important role as a teaching material,which is the discourse space for teaching activities with the teachings.Research and Analysis of High School Physics Textbooks concerned the teaching material for teachers to cultivate students’ key competencies,and can choose from the corresponding teaching material to provide version switching for teachers.In this research process,according to the different natures of various elements of physical key competencies,the level of physical key competencies is constructed in the physical high school curriculum standard,and 12 level division standards for physics textbooks(three sub-elements integrated by physical concepts are constructedfor 1 standard),than use standards to classify the compulsory part of 5high school physics textbooks that have passed the "2019 National Textbook Committee Expert Committee Review",and then calculate the overall level of each version of the textbook in physical key competencies.With the independent level,final analysis depends on the conclusions of the appropriate teaching materials that can guide teachers and students.The results show that the People’s Education Press has done a good job in cultivating students’ scientific reasoning,questioning and innovation,questions,scientific nature,scientific attitude,but it is insufficient in model construction,evidence,explanation,communication.The Shandong Science and Technology Edition has done a good job in physical concept,model construction,communication have been well done,in terms of scientific argumentation,scientific nature.The Education Science Edition has a relatively high level of cultivating students’ model construction competencies,and the overall appearance is quite satisfactory.The Guangdong Education Edition has a relatively high level of cultivating students’ scientific argumentation,evidence,interpretation competencies,but has a low level of questions and scientific attitude.Shanghai-Science version is done in cultivating students’ scientific exploration,the sub-elements of scientific attitude and responsibility,and the sub-elements of scientific thinking is insufficient.Based on the research results,suggestions are made for the editors to compile teaching materials,teachers’ selection and use of teaching materials.