Observation Of New Treatment Methods And Curative Effect Of Female Sexual Dysfunction

Objective To explore the feasibility of applying new temperature control radiofrequency technology and electrical stimulation combined with biofeedback technology in the treatment of female sexual dysfunction and the comparison of their efficacy,and explore the feasibility of applying specialized examination,clinical questionnaire and relevant body metrics to evaluate the effectiveness of female sexual dysfunction.Methods Patients admitted to the gynecological outpatient department of Peking University Shenzhen Hospital from July 2020 to December 2022 were recruited.Patients who strictly followed the exclusion criteria and were diagnosed as FSD were informed with the same content and were divided into experimental group A and experimental group B for real world study and controlled experiment.Experimental group A was treated with new temperature control radiofrequency therapy,and experimental group B was treated with electrical stimulation combined with biofeedback therapy.The treatment and follow-up of the two groups were carried out at the same time.The cotton swabs clitoral test results,Female Sexual Function Index(FSFI)questionnaire results,pelvic floor surface muscle potential results,sexual function test results,patient complaints,Vaginal volume condition were collected before,after and 3 months ±2 weeks after treatment.Results(1)Experimental group A: before and after treatment,FSFI scale score,pelvic floor surface muscle potential of Class I muscle potential and Class II muscle potential,peak II muscle potential in sexual function detection had statistical significance(P < 0.05),peak I muscle potential in sexual function detection had no statistical significance(P > 0.05);Before treatment and 3 months ±2 weeks after treatment,FSFI scale score,pelvic floor surface muscle potential of type I muscle potential and type II muscle potential differences were statistically significant(P < 0.05),sexual function detection of peak I muscle potential and peak II muscle potential differences were not statistically significant(P > 0.05).(2)Experimental group B: before and after treatment,there were statistically significant differences in FSFI scale score,pelvic floor surface muscle potential of Class I muscle potential and Class II muscle potential,and peak I muscle potential and peak II muscle potential in sexual function detection(P < 0.05);Before treatment and 3 months ±2 weeks after treatment,there were statistically significant differences in type I muscle potential and type II muscle potential in pelvic floor surface muscle potential(P < 0.05),but there were no statistically significant differences in FSFI scale score and peak I muscle potential and peak II muscle potential in sexual function test(P > 0.05).(3)Comparison between the two groups: FSFI scale score efficiency comparison,experimental group B was higher than experimental group A.There was no statistical significance between Class I muscle and Class II muscle,or between peak I muscle potential and peak II muscle response rate(P > 0.05).The score of FSFI scale,the score of Class I and Class II,and the increase rate of peak I potential and peak II electromyography in experimental group A was higher than that in experimental group B.Conclusion The score of FSFI scale,the score of Class I and Class II,and the increase rate of peak I potential and peak II electromyography in experimental group A was higher than that in experimental group B.