A Study On The Evaluation Of Rules In "GuoFeng" By Dai Junen And Chen Jikui

The Book of songs is an important literary classic in China,which has a history of academic research for more than two thousand years.In these two thousand years,the scholars of Han and Tang dynasties studied it and regarded it as the great law established by Confucius for later generations and realized the subtle meaning behind the words.The Song and Yuan dynasties studied Neo-Confucianism and obtained the meaning of the text itself according to the mutual agreement between the internal logic and the context of the text.In the Ming Dynasty,because Yang Ming’s mind emphasized "mind is reason","the unity of knowledge and practice"and "to conscience",people began to pay attention to their own hearts,and the interpretation of the Book of songs also began to turn to the output of self-cognition,which was very subjective and individual.And because of the Daxing imperial examination,the eight scholars have high requirements for writing skills,readers began to draw relevant writing skills from the classics,the Book of songs,as one of the traditional classics,naturally attracted the attention of many scholars."Conjecture and Comments of GuoFeng",which originated in the Ming Dynasty,is a critical work with obvious characteristics of interpreting the Poems in the Ming Dynasty.Dai Junen,the author,makes a subjective and individualized interpretation of the Book of songs by means of reading "poetry" by means of"mind".At the same time,he also makes a lot of comments on its artistic skills.This book has far-reaching influence,the most important thing is that in Qing Dynasty,there was an extra comment on the Book of songs,"Supplementary Writing of Conjecture and Comments of GuoFeng",which was written by Chen Jikui,a native of the Qing Dynasty.Chen continued Dai’s train of thought,also made a personalized interpretation of the Book of songs,and commented on its writing skills.Zhangfa refers to the skills of articles.The Book of songs has always been the object of study of traditional Chinese articles,and it is a broad sense of "articles" in modern concepts.Words,sentences and chapters are the components of the article.This paper studies the "zhangfa",and the concrete words are the rules of the use of the constituent elements of the article.This paper studies and discusses the two books from four aspects of "word method","syntax","structure" and "expression technique".Starting from the similarities,this paper points out the slight differences in the same,and explains their uniqueness.As far as "word method" is concerned,the two show the characteristics of"pluralistic angle",including structure,emotion,literary style,painting and so on.But in addition,Chen can also show the characteristics of the Book of songs in a contrastive way from the point of view of rhythm.Compared with the two,Chen’s exposition is more complete and comprehensive,his vision is wider,and he is beyond Dai’s.No matter for the sentence or the text,the word is the most basic unit,so the comments on the sentence method and the word method have a strong similarity,showing the situation of "no unique coincidence" with the word method.In addition to being able to discuss from the same point of view,the two of them also have their own uniqueness.Dai is good at discussing the aesthetic feelings brought to him by sentences,while Chen is good at evaluating sentences from the perspective of prosody.The syntactic comments of the two have their own advantages and disadvantages.The same perspective is that they are good at analyzing the structure of poetry from the point of view,analyzing the structure of poetry by narrative method,and displaying the structure of poetry with image metaphor.The difference is that Dai pays attention to context and is good at comparison,while Chen pays attention to the analysis of poetry structure from the aspect of phonology and style.In the evaluation of the expression techniques of the Book of songs,both of them are good at making their own names.Dai’s self-made name has the characteristics of concise image,while Chen’s is more simple and plain.