Research On The Intra-Party Accountability System Of The Communist Party Of China In The New Er

Intra-party accountability refers to a system in which party organizations with accountability authority require relevant party organizations and leading cadres to explain and explain the performance of their duties,and assume corresponding political responsibilities within the party for their violations of their duties.From the "SARS" incident in 2003 to the current COVID-19 pandemic,the accountability system within the party has been gradually applied to major areas of national governance,and groups of senior officials have been "accountable" stepped down or resigned,giving relevant power within the party Exercisers,including all party organizations and groups of leading cadres,are subject to warning education and power supervision,so that they can assume the responsibility of governing the party and governing the party.Firm your conviction.The inner-party accountability system has a profound political concept of accountability and power supervision.Its characteristics are: inner-party accountability is hierarchical,the accountability process is responsive,and the accountability results are punitive.Its functions are: discipline supervision,error correction prevention and error tolerance education.Reference and reference are the basis for system innovation.Both Vietnam and Cuba belong to the one-party governance of the Communist Party of socialist countries,and both focus on the role of anti-corruption in the accountability work,and strengthen the construction of accountability organizations to ensure strict accountability.Cuba pays attention to the rule of law and normalization of accountability within the party,while Vietnam attaches importance to the openness and fairness of accountability procedures,which effectively enhances the party’s governance effectiveness.As the most developed western capitalist economy and technology,the United States is a typical three-power check-and-balance government democracy,and its political accountability system has very mature characteristics of decentralization and checks and balances.Japan,a developed Asian country with the same cultural ties as China,is highly effective in anti-corruption and civil servant accountability.Singapore is one of the most incorrupt countries in the world.It has strict accountability and punishment measures,a complete legal supervision system,and a culture of integrity.Through comparison,we can draw the following accountability system concepts that can be used for reference in foreign countries: First,strictly guarantee the accountability supervision of power organs;second,expand channels for multiple heterogeneous accountability supervision;third,build a normalized accountability supervision operation mechanism.There are several shortcomings in the operation of our party’s accountability system: First,the accountability system is not comprehensive and precise.Mainly include the ambiguity and overlap of the scope of responsibilities,and the misplacement of rights and responsibilities;the incomplete list of responsibilities,and the misplacement of rights and responsibilities.Second,the accountability process is still incomplete.It is reflected in the lack of normalization of accountability and the imbalance of the accountability operation and supervision mechanism.Third,the lack of supervision under the same body accountability.It is mainly divided into the imperfect re-accountability mechanism within the party’s accountability and the lack of diversified accountability and supervision channels.Fourth,the accountability and relief system within the party is not mature enough.The specific manifestation is that the accountability target’s relief procedures are not systematic and the relief channels are single.Based on the theory of scientific and legalization of the accountability system within the party,there are four countermeasures for the shortcomings in the current practice of accountability within the party: the responsibility system must clearly define the scope of powers and responsibilities to achieve precise accountability.Ensure that responsibilities and powers are aligned.The accountability implementation procedures should be further refined to build a normalized accountability system and optimize the operating procedures of accountability power.It is necessary to build a diversified accountability and supervision channel inside and outside the party to improve the effectiveness of accountability,and realize the long-term development of the coordination and linkage of internal and external supervision,and a virtuous circle.To further improve the accountability relief mechanism within the party to better regulate the accountability power,the focus is to refine the accountability relief methods and standardize the relief operation procedures.