The Practice And Improvement Of Cross-regional Centralized Jurisdiction Reform Of Administrative Cases

Jurisdictional system is the starting point of the administrative litigation system,which plays a decisive role in the development of administrative litigation,but in practice,due to the improper interference of administrative organs,resulting in the loss of the possibility of litigants to be effective relief,thus,the jurisdictional issues as the beginning of administrative litigation,has been controversial.The current administrative litigation jurisdiction system,when established,fails to fully take into account the characteristics of the administrative litigation system mechanism,and fails to fully provide a favorable environment for the independent and fair implementation of trial results.Regrettably,some administrative trial systems have been designed with certain flaws,and have become a hotbed of unlawful interference in administrative trials by local administrative organs.In order to eliminate the shortcomings of the institutional mechanism of administrative litigation system and overcome the problem of home and away due to the overlap of judicial and administrative jurisdictions,the reform of cross-regional centralized jurisdiction of administrative cases has been carried out in full swing throughout the country,and Article 18(2)of the new Administrative Procedure Law also provides legal provisions to support the reform throughout the country.This article uses empirical analysis and literature review to study the problems of crossregional centralized jurisdiction of administrative litigation system in practice in China.The article analyzes the characteristics of various reform models in practice,and attempts to explore the successful experiences achieved in the process of cross-regional centralized jurisdictional reform of administrative cases,such as breaking local interference to a certain extent,enhancing judicial credibility,strengthening the protection of the rights of administrative counterparts,and improving the public’s sense of access to justice,taking the reform practice in Hunan Province as an example.At the same time,from the reform practice in Hunan Province,it is found that there are still many problems in the process of cross-regional jurisdictional reform of administrative cases,such as the contradiction between the amount of case trial tasks and the strength of case trial,the contradiction between judicial justice and judicial efficiency,and the intervention of administrative organs is still not completely eliminated.Therefore,for this reason,the author proposes to innovate the system design of cross-regional centralized jurisdiction of administrative litigation in China,firmly establish the principles of judicial independence,judicial justice and convenience to the parties,and clearly establish the reform goal of administrative courts,based on practical experience,steadily and steadily,treat both the symptoms and the root causes,and effectively explore,establish and improve the cross-regional centralized jurisdiction system of administrative cases in line with the actual situation in China.