Research On Procuratorial Participation In Social Governance Of Grassroots Public Interest Litigation

With the deepening of China’s judicial system reform,the procuratorial function has undergone significant adjustments.As the legal supervision organ of the country,the procuratorial organs use judicial remedies to intervene in illegal and improper behaviors of private or administrative entities,in order to protect the public interests of the country and society.This is a new expansion of the procuratorial function’s participation in social governance under the situation of the superposition of changes in procuratorial work.However,social governance is more important and difficult at the grassroots level.Therefore,how to carry out litigation activities around the protection of public interests and use judicial authority to promote social governance has become one of the main areas of research and practice for grassroots procuratorial organs.Y County is a national ecological civilization demonstration county and a practical innovation base for "green mountains and clear waters are golden mountains and silver mountains".Since the establishment of the public interest litigation system initiated by the procuratorate,the People’s Procuratorate of Y County has delivered excellent transcripts to consolidate the ecological civilization achievements of Y County and protect the green mountains and waters of Y County,whether in the legal field or in other fields.The political,social,and legal effects are very outstanding.However,the governance challenges it faces in playing its role in public interest litigation and participating in social governance are common in county-level grassroots procuratorial organs.Therefore,taking the participation of Y County People’s Procuratorate in public interest litigation in social governance as the starting point not only has certain representativeness,but also has strong research value.Therefore,this article takes Y County as a typical case and uses research methods such as literature research,case analysis,and on-site investigation to study the participation of grassroots public interest litigation prosecutors in social governance.Mainly based on the specific considerations of China’s national conditions and judicial practice,by organizing and analyzing the current development reality and construction path of the socialist procuratorial public interest litigation system with Chinese characteristics,the difficulties and problems encountered by grassroots public interest litigation procurators in participating in social governance are analyzed,with a focus on analyzing the reasons behind the dilemma of protecting national and social public interests through legal thinking and legal methods.Based on grassroots procuratorial practice,Some targeted countermeasures and suggestions were proposed.This article mainly discusses four parts: The first part defines the core concept of public interest litigation procuratorial participation in social governance and elaborates on relevant theories.At the same time,it provides a detailed review of the specific types of public interest litigation initiated by procuratorial organs,the handling process,and the urgency of participating in social governance.The second part clarifies the current situation of the participation of public interest litigation prosecutors in social governance in Y County.Specifically,starting from the public interest litigation prosecution department and public interest protection leadership group established by the Y County People’s Procuratorate,as well as the exchange of cadres on temporary duty,it focuses on the governance achievements it has achieved in the fields of food and drugs,public safety,ecological environment,etc.through special activities,initiation of pre litigation procedures,and legal publicity.The third part analyzes in depth the relevant reasons for the limited scope,effectiveness,joint efforts,and level of participation in public interest litigation by the People’s Procuratorate of Y County in terms of the types of cases involved in Y County’s participation in social governance,weak supervision and implementation of procuratorial suggestions,low mobilization of collaborative governance,and insufficient improvement of team experience and ability.The fourth part proposes relevant countermeasures and suggestions based on the current development of public interest litigation prosecution.Firstly,it focuses on top-level design and deeply cultivates the main responsibility of public interest litigation;Secondly,focus on supervision methods and make good use of procuratorial suggestions;The third is to focus on mechanism construction and build a collaborative governance pattern;The fourth is to focus on team management and create a new force for governance.As a unique judicial system in China,procuratorial organs do not refer to templates in the practical process of filing public interest litigation.In this study,relevant theoretical achievements on the participation of public interest litigation in social governance in China and abroad were drawn on,and theoretical analysis and practical exploration were conducted using the Y County People’s Procuratorate’s participation in public interest litigation in social governance as a case.Some operational and practical suggestions were proposed,which can have a positive and positive impact on the grassroots procuratorial organs in China to play their role in public interest litigation and participate in local social governance practices.