| Housing is a very important element of life.Not only does the public pay high attention,but the government has also conducted varying degrees of regulation and control in the field of housing.In the 2016 Central Economic Work Conference,the central government clarified the development direction of the housing market,pointing out that "houses are for living,not for speculation".The original intention is to lead the healthy development of housing and real estate,and curb the unhealthy investment attributes of houses.In recent years,the siphon effect of developed cities on talent has gradually emerged,and major cities have introduced talent policies,with housing concessions being a key factor.This case comprehensively understands the actual situation of the implementation of the housing policy of talent shared property rights in District C of City B through the telephone survey of relevant departments and house buyers in District C of City B,and in-depth interviews with the heads of the policy issuing department,the executive department,and the handling personnel.According to the survey,the housing policy issued by District C of City B has achieved some success in recruiting talents.However,due to unreasonable policy design,lack of specialization of the executive agency,weak awareness of integrity of the target group,single mode of common ownership of property rights,imperfect process supervision mechanism and other factors,problems such as rampant speculation,policy interruption,storm of public opinion and other issues occurred in the process of policy implementation,which led to an implementation dilemma.This paper studies the case through the Smith model,and puts forward the path choice of improving the talent shared property housing policy from four aspects: improving the policy science system,improving the effectiveness of the executive body,expanding the participation of target groups,and optimizing the policy implementation environment,which explores a new content for promoting the "talent shared property housing policy". |