| Nowadays,due to the excessive use of traditional energy sources,countries have caused frequent problems such as ecological environment deterioration,energy failure,natural disasters,etc.Based on this,the international community begins to explore and develop new energy sources to support the traditional energy sources,so as to walk out of a sustainable development of new energy road.The combination of finance and the development of new energy industry has also become an important growth point of the profits of various countries in the new era.As a result,"new energy" has become a regular reporting issue of various financial media.Therefore,the author takes the reports of Chinese and foreign financial media on new energy as the research object,aiming to explore the similarities and differences of Chinese and western reports on global hot issues.This paper selects the domestic new financial media "Caixin Net" and the first national financial circulation and the American financial media The Wall Street Journal(Wall Street Journal)as the research sample.Through the analysis of the framework theory,it can be seen that the media reports of both countries take domestic interests as the starting point and have obvious ideological differences.At the same time,through discourse analysis,it can be concluded that Caixin actively discusses from the political,economic and social levels,and the fundamental reason for supporting the development of new energy is to publicize the implementation of national policies.In the report,the Wall Street Journal emphasized the political and economic attributes of the development of new energy,considering how to better protect the national interests and states,and implying "imperialism","geopolitics" and "hegemony".Finally,this paper summarizes the similarities and differences between the two reports,proposes that the former new energy reports have "message framework","obvious data source bias" and "simple analysis",and puts forward suggestions from the macro,medium and micro levels. |