Study Of Prescription And Syndrome Theory System Of Treaty Of Febrile And Miscellaneous Based On Proposition Logic

Objective: To study the prescription and syndrome theory system ofTreaty of febrile and miscellaneous from the viewpoint of propositionlogic and try to reach or approach the following study objective—toestablish the studying model of Treaty of febrile and miscellaneous fromthe viewpoint of logic and linguistics; to make the frame of prescriptionand syndrome theory of Treaty o f febrile and miscellaneous, and developthe hypothysis of Hefang theory and grammar and semantics ofprescription of Treaty of febrile and miscellaneous.Method Study the conditional sentence in the book of Treaty offebrile and miscellaneous from implication theory, probe the conditionalsentence including modal words such as 'nessesity' 'probability'; 'should''probability' from the attitude of proposition; reveal the modal logicimplication in it; study the condition that makes the conditional sentenceto be true from significance theory; discuss the syndrome and prescriptionin the book of Treaty of febrile and miscellaneous from the viewpoint oflinguistics; study the ontology of the syndrome from the viewpoint ofanalysis philosophy.Result We've dicovered that the logic related to 'name' from the Treatyof febrile and miscellaneous, found the trace of' name it in accordancewith its form' and the debating form 'name' 'diction' and'doctrine', comprehended the appliance of 'anacology' 'cause''rationale', extracted the 'essential axiom' of treatment and diagnosis ofTreaty of febrile and miscellaneous, discovered the induction similaritiesand differences existing in the treatment system of 'syndrome toprescription' and 'syndrome to principle to prescription'.The negativeconception possesses important effect on the treatment based on differentsyndrome. The joint appliance of negative and positive conceptionmetaphors the problem of syndrome as a whole. The system ofprescription and syndrome includes three basic conceptions, ie 'oneprescription with one syndrome' 'similar prescription with syndrome''prescriptions with syndromes'. 'Hefang syndrome' is the combination oftwo 'one prescription with one syndrome', it can be classified as new'similar Hefang sydrome'and'Hefang syndrome', while 'similar Hefangsyndrome' can form new 'prescription and syndrome'. According to the Set theory method, we can obtain the connections among 'one diseasewith one syndrome', 'one disease with syndromes', 'one syndrome withdiseases', 'syndromes with diseases' and 'all the disease with all thediseases'. We've also got the point that one prescription seems to be asentence from the viewpoint of linguistic, extracted 'Syntax','Pragmatics' and 'semantic' according to the linguistic point and foundthe fact that 'the method to determine syndrome according toprescription' is not feasible, it can't completely match the logic trait ofproposition.There exists a property and individual relationship betweenthe syndrome named by pathogenesis and that named by prescriptions, itis a relationship between pedicate and subject.We can see that thepathogen of TCM possesses different ontology with WM fromphilosophy. The ontology of WM is the ontologic fact, and that of TCM isthe ontologic commitment.The problem of syndrome as a whole shouldinclude how the showing 'sequence of syndromes and signs' merges withits bachground, how the syndrome develops into another one and howthey form the whole sydrome in larger degree.Conclusion: The 'three yi and yang system' is a new system that differsfrom 'yin and yang system'. There exists a conversion of logicrelationship between 'syndrome to prescription' and 'syndrome toprinciple to prescription'. The act of giving a value to the negativeconception in the syndrome stdudying needs to be discussed. The methodof classifying syndromes according to 'prescription and syndrome' isdifferent from the zangfu and other syndrome classification, there is aoverlap between the 'prescription and syndrome' and other classification,or we can say that the limits of prescription and syndrome is vague. In theprocess of establishing the 'syndrome to prescription' system, the book ofTreaty of febrile and miscellaneous used what we called full conditionalhypothesis proposition, ie. If it is some syndrome, there must be someprescription.If we use the precondition hypothesis proposition, we oftenmake the preface of necessity conditional hypothesis to form conjunction,and make it to be preface of full conditional hypothesis proposition, thento form a new full conditional hypothesis proposition. The logic type inthe book of Treaty of febrile and miscellaneous is maily modal logic,especially items with prescription and syndrome in the conditionalsentence can be regarded as 'moral logic' or 'standard logic'. The modalneeded to be studied in the book of Treaty of febrile and miscellaneous isnot only 'necessity' and 'probability', more are 'should', 'permit' and 'prohibit'. If we want to explain it with the implication theory, we needthe coherence implication to expound it, ie depending on relatedbackgroud knowledge to build up the bridge connecting the former to thelatter. The 'syndrome and prescription' in the book of Treaty of febrileand miscellaneous can be expounded by linguistic method, ie'Syntax', 'pragmatics'and 'semantics', by which to probe the meaning ofthe connection in different linguisitic environment. The method ofdetermining syndrome by prescription is unfeasible, or we can say that itis not correct, it is null and void in logic. This kind of method is not anfeasible method, so its conclusion is not logically true. The opinion of'taking phenomenon as element, element as state, state as syndrome'given by Academician Wang Yongyan is a kind of chain implication, andit is a kind of tautology, ie logically true. If the time and space area isdefinite, the same disease and syndrome is same on the concrete, definiteand practical signifcance. If the time and space area is uncertain, the samedisease and syndrome can meet the identity on the concrete,definite andpractical significance, there would appear 'one disease containingsyndromes'. If the space area is uncertain but the time area is definite, thedifferent disease and the same syndrome can meet the identity on theconcrete, definite and practical significance, ie different disease seems tobe the same because they possess the same syndrome, now there wouldappear diseases showing one syndrome.