| The school of (Discussion in Jlncient Chinese History stands at a crutial phase during the transaction from traditional research on The Book of Songs to modern studies .this school plays a significant role in this phylogeny by both breaking the bondage of tradition and promoting the research transaction.This essay focuses on analyzing the viewpoints of this school on the research of The Book of Songs at the following respects :literature,culture,historiography, sociology and folklore.The analyses will be based on the pectination of relevant materials and of existing research.There are 6 chapters in total:Chapter One offers the cutural background under the arising of the discussion in ancient Chinese history school,especially focusing on those contents relevant to the arguements about the research on The Book of Songs;Chapter 2 analyzes the academical background of this school ,basically from the core part of the researches on The Book of Songs.This analyse goes along two ways: the doubtful thoughts towards ancient remarks during the phyolgeny of The Book of Songs studies,and,the arguements of modern literature v.s. traditional literature in the era of late Qing dynasty and MinGuo.Chapter 3 and Chapter 4 step rather deeply and comprehensively into analyses of the viewpoints from two whole show in this field,HuShi and Gu Jiegang.There is a thorough exploration about these two academicians' remarks on the The Book of Songs studies.Chapter 5 gives out the arguements arised by The (Discussions in Chinese jlncient History school,especially the main viewpoints in academical field, and hackles the research of Qian Xuantong,Zhen Zhengduo and Yu Pingbo on The Book of Songs study; Meanwhile,this chapter analyzes the different and doubtful kinds of voices about the viewpoints of the discussion in Chinese history school on The Book of Songs study.Chapter 6 reviews the achievements and losses of the research on The (Book of Songs of this school,and gives out a wholy and systemic perspective.efforts have been put in to make these appraises as objective as possible. |