| In the 21st century, science and technology has already become the key of understanding all contemporary questions, the question of ecientific and technological ethics is more and more outstanding, become the ethics research and the most forward position of practice, so must strengthen the scientific and technological study of ethics, promote it to science and technology effective and beneficial domination and use, the advanced culture of building science of growing with each passing hour and harmonious development of humanity needs strengthening to the scientific and technological study of ethics. This text proceeds from basic position and view of Marxist philosophy's ethics, consult domestic and international new development that ethics study, regard research results of responsibility ethics as tool that theory analyses. This text attempts to make new exploration in the frames of the visual angle and narration studied: This text regards " I " as the visual angle and thread, launch research for the target with network technology, human cloning technology two major front technological case and ecological ethics problem that science and technology cause. The ethics problem that these modern science and technology caused has been widenned modern ethics looked at the land. This text carry on casual overall research to ethics problem these, concentrate on " I " obviously (from " oneself" to " kinds of I "), question at. Carry on research to modern ethics in a meaning innovated most from them. This text is made up of three parts: First, open human nature laboratory: Ethics paradox of the network technology. The networked computer has already not merely been a computer in the function meaning of information processing, in fact has already become a kind of brand-new contacts tool, and then develop into a kind of new life style and culture, have occupied the position of the pillar of the contemporary human society rapidly. As the human psychology and testing laboratory of ethics, the fictitious life of the cyberspace has represented the numerous and complicated and complicated network culture phenomenon for us, how to hold culture phenomenon of the network in terms of ethics, how to make the cultural strategy of network which conforms with ethics, carry on important goal that ethics think to fictitious life. This text think central question fictitious I ethics predicament that the actual situation fluctuate since in the world most. It because last one piece information technology world not fictitious, it subvert a traditional one the real /ethics concept not timid, split " real I " and " timid I " into " I " also, produce one unprecedented problem -real self and timid my ethics contradiction. Real self and timid my ethics contradiction made out with the network technology mainly of this text, in order to mainly discuss the question of information technology ethics. Namely prepare a " true ethics idea " in " fictitious world ". Whether this text research fictitious game is it play chess to fight oneself. Including the actual situation identity of " I " is varied;" I " combine with the division of one more; Have announced fictitious world self-inflation and lost: The fictitious world excessively free evil consequence is that the anarchism overflows; The extreme inflation of self-interests causes the crime of the network; Dissociate and indulge in and cause the self-forfeiture. This text has proposed building the principle of constructing of the following network ethics: 1. Review and criticize, this is that ethics of the network builds philosophy constructed to link degree; 2. Responsibility is that the ethics of the network builds the first principle constructed; 3. Discussion isthat the ethics of the network builds the bridge constructed;4. Community should build and construct autonomy ethics the network;5. The self-network should build and construct automatic control ethics;6. Associate and should reach complementarily and balancedly in ethics of two circles of the actual situation;7. Network ethics goal constructed to build should to adjust right to up to self-happy oneself. This text thinks, at network age, it is to criticize and review the network's culture itself to build the key task of constructing criticizing and reviewing culture. Obviously, the criticism is it should regard masses as standard to review, so main task its to is it replace masses think but let people oneself not to is it criticize and review fictitious life to go to go. So, thinkers in this course should not regard going in legislators' position as the masses and stipulate what is meant by positive fictitious life, and can only with explain attitude of the person who show proves own annotation explanatory note and prerequisite while being a certain. Such an annotation explanatory note is unimportant, the more important thing is its " covering " function, namely it make people see a great deal of life that accept is it have place thought to worth to arrange without thinking just originally. Second, it is awkward that duplicate oneself:Ethics problem of the technology of human cloning. Any question has not caused so strong a society to shake like question of human cloning in the field of ethics of today, so enormous idea difference, so fierce an academic theory. This text has introduced the research current situation of technological ethics of human cloning of debating endlessly at first, including the reason of the persons who agree to and the opposition person's voice should set up cloning ethics culture to put forward limitedly of a kind of rich sense of duty that looks forward the prospect, such limited aim of cloning ethics culture is to face the future and bear responsibility, is it cause " evil " that oneself destroy to prevent from, prevent technicalization from is it solve constructing to family ethics to commit incest. This text thinks, it is the technological lie deceiving people toclone the perfect person, the human cloning is difficult to form oneself admitting psychologically in culture, responsibility ethics should insist on regarding people as the purpose, resist the tool inclination of the human body. The view of this text is:Ones that is with other ethics culture are constructive and different, in the face of clone technology, it is the limited cloning ethics culture that we need construction, namely express our ethics responsibility through denying the technology of human cloning. Contemporary ethics culture basic task constructed to build to pursue one of practice a high one kind most, but should prevent a kind of greatest evil, namely denying ethics culture --From building good ethics culture to preventing fierce culture, it is the ethics of setting up forbidden zone. Contemporary morals basic task of behavior lie in one of practice a high one kind most (whether this first overbearing proud boundless thing at all perhaps), and lie in preventing a kind of greatest evil, protect and save the victim who faces the threat. Third, environmental responsibility: Ecological ethics of scientific technological development. Science and technology is that the mankind transforms naturally, and the means that the respect that control need to the mankind naturally transform, however, real consequences of scientific technical application all have a dual character :On one hand can improve the ability that the mankind transform the natural environment, strengthen the human survival and development;Will destroy the natural environment during the process of developing on the other hand, thus will also damage mankind's long-term lasting existence and ability of development. This text has investigated at first the modern science and technology influence one layer of structure way of circle of the environment, and has put forward the principle frame of building ethics culture of constructing sustainable development in view of the above:The earth ethics of sustainable development is from mechanical view to the jumping and moving of life view;The ethics of border of taking the place of of sustainable development is to build the responsibility...
|
PDF Full Text Request