A Study Of Zizek’s Dialectic Thought

The Slovenian philosopher Slavoj ?i?ek’s thought is very complex,but dialectics is an important part of it,both from the sources of thought he inherited and from the development of his own thought.And from the whole development history of dialectics,Zizek has promoted the thought of dialectics.This paper takes Zizek’s dialectics as the research object and discusses its ideological origin and its own development.The article is divided into the following parts:The introduction part mainly combs and summarizes the domestic and foreign research status of Zizek’s thought,especially his dialectics,so as to provide a background and coordinate for the writing of the whole article.The first chapter discusses Lacan’s subjectivity and its influence on Zizek.No matter how complex the source of Zizek’s thought is,Lacan is the background and background of his thought,and his absorption of Hegel’s dialectics is mediated by Lacan."Divided subject" is the main conceptual framework that Zizek inherited from Lacan and the core content of his dialectic subjectivity.Zizek mainly inherited the late Lacan’s psychoanalytic theory organized around the real world.The "divided subject" consists of three "parts" : the self,the unconscious,and the void between them;From another perspective,Lacan and Zizek’s "three realms" are the three faces of the "divided subject".From the perspectives of jigsaw puzzle and the formation of the self,the cutting and unconsciousness of the original experience by language,and the "remnant material" that seeks to be recombined,the relationship between the imaginary world,the symbolic world and the real world and the "divided subject" is discussed,and the subjective view of Lacan and Zizek is discussed in detail.This chapter finally puts into practice Lacan’s "ethics of desire and subject of action",which have a profound and direct impact on both Zizek’s ideological theory and his dialectic thought.Through the interpretation of Lacan,we will focus on the transformation and promotion of Zizek’s dialectics in the second chapter.This transformation and advancement is mainly reflected in Zizek’s interpretation of the main proposition of Hegel’s philosophy,"Entity is subject".To do this also need to advance to do a simple introduction to Hegel’s dialectics,it’s "real body" this proposition,main show is Hegel’s dialectics entity or absolute provided by subject out of dialectical dimensions to realize itself out process,this process can only is a process of negation of negation,realizing their own process,or the same with the aid of the difference.However,when Zizek equates the entity with Lacan’s real world,his deeper purpose is to dismember the real world of the entity through the difference contained in the subject,so as to make it into a Lacanian object A.This involves the relationship between subject and entity.Kant,however,is the first to explore this question,and he deals with it in a reflective way,so that the subject and the substance(the thing in itself)are still separated by a gulf.In Zizek’s view,Hegel’s advancement of Kant’s problem is not to unify Kant’s duality form,but to completely inlay the contrarian dimension of the subject into the entity(the thing in itself),thereby polarizing Kant.Here,there is a fundamental difference between Zizek and Hegel in dialectics: Zizek holds that Hegel’s dialectics that he has reached the positive by means of negation is the direct confirmation and demonstration of the positive in the form of negation.In this way,the infinite judgment put forward by Hegel becomes the final form of his understanding of Hegel’s dialectics,and the propositions such as "spirit is a bone" are the concentrated embodiment of the dialectics obtained by Zizek.On this basis,he also grasped Hegel’s logic as a process of idealization,thereby completely laconizing Hegel.The advancement of Zizek to Hegel’s dialectics is to fully reveal the critical nature of dialectics so as to lay the foundation for his political practice.In the third chapter,we further discuss Zizek’s further implementation of his new dialectic form after his advancement of Hegel’s dialectics.The concrete manifestation is that the critical nature of this new dialectic is fully demonstrated by the revolutionary subject and its revolutionary action.Therefore,we first explore the critical dimension of dialectics in general.The conclusion is: if dialectics only adopts cognitive attitude,its criticism can only be external;In view of this,if we want to reveal the criticality of dialectics,we must transform it into ontology,that is,from the perspective of external reflection to the self-criticism of things.In this way,dialectics is closely related to the ideological criticism based on social existence and behavior revealed by Zizek.As the bearer of dialectics of ontological form,the revolutionary subject will come forward from the current cynicism consciousness.This also determines that this subject can only be paradoxical and hollow,and is excluded by the mainstream ideology.In Zizek’s opinion,when the labor movement has failed,only this kind of subject is the bearer of the revolution and the new infinite class.However,what kind of revolutionary action should this new revolutionary subject take to criticize? Due to the paradoxical characteristics of the new subject and object,it determines that his action mode is neither the traditional positive type nor the negative type shown by some post-structuralism,but a middle way,namely the politics of subtraction.It draws back the different things of different germplasms to the smallest ontological difference,so as to directly highlight the affirmation in the negation,thus crossing the illusion of ideology and maintaining an open posture for criticism.This is also Zizek’s substantive implementation of Hegel’s dialectics.The fourth chapter discusses the inheritance of Zizek’s dialectics to Marx,its advantages and limitations.Based on the concepts of Lacan and Freud’s psychoanalysis,Zizek realized the connection with Marx and absorbed Marx’s thoughts into his dialectic theory.Mainly reflected in the following several pairs of concepts: Psychoanalysis dream job and the unconscious form of commodity with Marx,psychoanalysis dream,symptoms and Marx’s commodity fetishism,the illusion of psychoanalysis formula $derive a,play with Marx a term used to describe the behavior of human capitalism condition "I did it my way" or "is still",residual pleasure of psychoanalysis and Marx’s surplus value.Through such conceptual resonance and connection,Zizek expanded the whole analytical perspective from individual psychology and family to the whole society,so as to serve his dialectics,especially the revolutionary juche thought.This chapter then evaluates the strengths and limitations of Zizek’s dialectic thought.Firstly,it evaluates the gain and loss of Zizzek’s inheritance of Marx.This part discusses the development situation of capitalism after Marx with reference to Baudrillard’s consumption society and related theories.Second is flaw and the insufficiency of alignment zeki dialectics thought gives a summative evaluation,this part with similar ideological orientation was Mr And buddy Europe as reference,the first general orientation he dialectics of general meaning,and then analyze its dialectics thought,especially the modern critique of capitalism and the main body of revolution flaw and the insufficiency.