Hu Han-min's Thought About Three People's Principles In Early Time

Hu Han-min was a 1911 Revolution renowned bourgeois democracy revolutionary. While he was joining in practice struggle, he positively carried on revolutionary theoretical propaganda and exploration. It had riched and perfected the Three People's Principles of Sun Yat-sen theory system, and powerfully impelled revolution to move forward.Hu Han-min's nationalism thought profoundly exposed the Qing government's trick to control Han people, the attack settles decayed which the government ruled, the cruelty to people. But it had to compromise big powers. At the same time he condemned the inherent incorrigibility which some Han people bureaucrat had and they submited to the government . Hu Han-min proved it necessary to overthrown the Qing Dynasty's rule by violence. He regarded army as main force. He pointed out it was the successful key to depend upon the Qing armed forces .Hu Han-min's democracy thought had typical significance. He criticized "the ordered constitution by the emperor personally", showing its essence was strengthening the despotic authority. Then he pointed out our goal should be establishing republican constitutionalism country. His regime view, party view as well as people's each right thoughts obtained good manifesting in the revolutionary practice.His livelihood thought emphasized through checking soil-rent value, realizating nationalization of land. At the same time nation must control the development of great capital. He advocated we should strengthen trade between China and foreign to promote social economy development and prosperity.In his early time Hu Han-min's theory about the Three People'sPrinciples of Sun Yat-sen had made important elaboration and supplement to the Sun Yat-Sen's thought. He had taken beneficial exploration and display in certain aspects, some having true knowledge distinguished opinion.lt was worth to affirmation.But Hu Han-min's views also had its limitation and insufficiency. Appraising the Qing Dynasty temporality, he revealed some narrow nationalism thought and incorrect understanding. He looked upon to the depressed classes' strength, only believing "the medium society" influence. He thought the big powers could not destroy China to revolutionize, holding impractical fantasy to the imperialism. His livelihood view didn't oppose the landlord class owning land thoroughly. Trading between China and foreign, he had overlooked the premise as equal contact.