Study On Xiezhen's Poetics Theory And Criticism

Xiezhen's poetics theory mainly consisted by the theory of poem writing, the works and criticism, which includes inspiration, conception, emotion and scene, nature and trueness, cultivate and comprehend, syntaxes, modification, complexity and simpleness, emptiness, blankness and entity, renaissance, poem style, poem rhyme and so on.In the theory of inspiration, Xiezhen claimed that inspiration is the dominant factor, it can make poem creation perfect; In the theory of conception, he claimed that conception should make perfect combination with language, he opposed the viewpoint that establish a conception before write a poem; In the theory of emotion and scene, he affirmed that emotion and scene should introject perfectly; In the theory of nature and trueness, he thought that the language of a poem should be nature and the feeling should be truer; In the theory of cultivate and comprehend, he thought that an author should read extensively and good understanding; In the theory of syntaxes, he thought that we should pay attention to the syntaxes, but it is no need to stickle the syntaxes;In the theory of modification, he thought that poem should be refined; In the theory of complexity and simpleness, he thought that a complicated poem should be simplified;In the theory blankness and entity, he thought that the blankness should make perfect combination with entity, and it should make an artistic word for readers;In the theory of renaissance, he thought that we should be good at studying the spirit of ancients, and don't copy the ancient's worlds,style and so on; In the theory of poem style, he raised an important opinion, that a poem has four styles, and he brought the inspiration,interest,odour,truth,nimbus,rhyme in to the theory of poem style, so he enriched the theory; In the theory of poem rhyme, he made the rhyme combination with ability, deepened the theory of poem rhyme;In the criticism of poems of past dynasties, he canonize four words poem of the Chin Dynasty and the Han Dynasty, but he argued against to copy those poems; he made a high comment on poem of Tang Dynasty, contrarily, on the contrary, he made a low comment on the poems of Song Dynasty and Ming Dynasty, but, at the same time, he also noticed the new value of the poem of Song Dynasty and Ming Dynasty.