The Research Of Poly-governance Of Public Crisis

Public crisis events facing the world today is the problem of universal, at this stage, our country is in economic transition and social transition, the existence of many unstable factor led to a series of social problems gradually emerged. The issue has become latent cause of public crisis, a number of unexpected events could trigger regional and, indeed, a national public crisis. How to effectively address these public crises will be directly related to the government authority in the eyes of the status of citizens and good image, and impacting on our political stability and economic development. Based on analytical framework of governance theory, the key to public crisis governance is breaking the traditional, semi-closed management model is public crisis management. Constructing a broad and inclusive governance model. Governance is not limited to the main body of the government, also including non-governmental organizations, the media, the public and other social forces. Response to crisis, not only the government managed to give full play subjectivity, but also the full role of non-governmental organizations, the role of the media and other social forces, and construction poly-of governance mode of government and society.This paper is divided into five parts. In the introduction, the paper described the background and significance of topics, presented papers at home and abroad of the situation and the analytical framework and research methods. The first part discusses the issues raised, on the related concepts of crisis governance, has defined the grasp of the "public crisis," "crisis management", "public crisis of governance" of the basic content. Songhua River water pollution incident, for example, leads the government in crisis governance in a series of problems, that the government should play exactly what role, bear any kind of role? As a social force, what role the media should play? Can not simply rely on the government to effectively address the public crisis?The second part, the theoretical framework of crisis governance-governance theory were discussed by the meaning of governance theory, the value and applicability analysis, for the following public discussion of the crisis of Pluralism provide strong theoretical support, and through the "center of government," the defects and the theory and practice of crisis response both to explain the need from management to governance by the crisis of governance theory is a new development.The third part of the crisis on government forces and social forces to discuss the crisis of governance, namely government and social organizations were political process. The government is leading the crisis governance, but a single government-led to can not achieve the effective management of the crisis, also non-governmental organizations, the public, the media and other social forces need to participate.The fourth part discusses the public crisis of governance mechanism for collaboration between government and the social construction, primarily through government and non-governmental organizations in the collaboration and cooperation between the government and the media to explain the crisis management in the coordination of government and society governance.Finally, at present, any single measure taken by any party can not make crisis management more effective and more feasible, regardless of past or future, to participate in the management of a multi-path is a viable option. It's about discussing that public crisis management emphasizes shared responsibility of multiple actors, to strengthen the collaboration between the government and the community to build the government and society ruled by a crisis management model.