Three Elite Men Shake-hands Grip Table Tennis Players's Technical And Tactical Analysis

In this paper, Wang Liqin and other three shake-hands grip the world's best men's table tennis athletes in the 2007-2009 analysis of actualcombat, in the three-stage method based on wins and loses from the perspective of a concrete analysis of field placement of serving, The third sub-board response technologies and their pros and cons to find out more technical score and lose points, and find out thereasons for their future training and competition to provide some recommendations.Through research and analysis, draw the following conclusions:1 Wang Liqin's serve and attack at a higher scoring percentage, but the usage is relatively low. Scoring percentage of reserve is better, and the usage is also high. Stalemate segment plays a very unstable, scoring in a huge difference between win and lose game.2 Wang Liqin's Serve placement is relatively simple, mainly on tables, mainly within the centre. In win games, get started within the next tee and bottom line results better get started scoring, the third board to the main sights on the next spin, stalemate scoring rate is relatively high, but the forehand was attacked losing a bit more.in lose matches, reserve mainly is drop shot, and attack on table in more mistakes get started. The third board to sights on the next spin, the spin attack and put short-based. Stalemate backhand errors are more active, are also losing a backhand bit more passive. Stalemate lines to the main angle shot and angle shot.3 Maloneg serves a good score, the utilization rate is also normal. Section is very good reserve is the main regional scores, the utilization rate is very high. Malong's stalemate is weakness, the attack is not strong and the failures are more4 Malong's serve on table center, semi-introduced and the introduction of the ball will be more. Win games, reserve to put a short write-splitting and on table get started within the main effect of good scores, the third board to sights on the next spin and spin attack on the main sights on the next spin of the scoring rate was higher on the spin attack more mistakes. Negative match reserve to put the main short and get started on table, the third plate above the main attack, but the scoring rate is not high. Stalemate segment capacity is relatively poor, are lethal backhand is not strong. Stalemate miter oblique lines to the main effect of difference in the outcome of games scoring a larger。5 Boll in the win games scoring percentage very high in the serve and attack. scoring percentage in reserve is also more than good, and the utilization rate is higher, Stalemate scoring percentage for the pass. In lose games serve attack scoring percentage is fail, scoring percentage in reserve as a pass, but the usage is very high, Stalemate scoring percentage is far lower than the passing standard6 Boll serve mainly on right table and center. In win games, reserve to the desks to pick up, put write short and split the main sights on scoring results were better, the third board to the main sights on the next rotation, scoring higher rate of convergence of relatively smooth backhand stalemate, is backhand score effects are good, but it is the backhand position and the Middle lose points for being more offensive. Negative match the return of serve to put a short-based, the third board to sights on the next spin and spin attack on the main, while the inroads backspin score good results. Stalemate in their own mistakes are more consecutive backhand attack is less stable. Stalemate miter oblique lines to the main opponent of the Boll offensive line pressure greater.