The Comparative Research On 1-3 Compulsory Routines Of National Fitness Aerobics Exercise Standard

The administration center of the gymnastics attached to the General Administration of Sport of China has convened a number of experts to compose the"National Fitness Aerobics Standards"which is applied to different fitness levels of people to exercise. The aim of the implementation is to carry out all the specific measures of the"National fitness Program", to build up people's health, to push forward the spread and popularization of the fitness aerobics, to fully play the role of fitness aerobics in public fitness, to meet the needs of the public fitness and to provide more and better scientific methods of fitness.By the 13 years of promotion, the number of the people who have reached the standard is more than 200 thousands and shows a very good result which has played a very important role to the popular fitness activities and it is a great step in promoting the implementation of the National fitness Program. However, there are still a lot of problems existed in implementation and have not formed a system which is systematic, standard and integrated. This paper has applied the methods of literature review, questionnaire, video analysis, interviews and data statistics to understand the cognition, evaluation and expectation of the participants for the future new standard towards the"Fitness Aerobics Standards". The writer has concluded the opinions and provided some referential ideas for the future choreography of the standard from the cognition, characteristics and contents to analyze the differences of the compulsory exercise from three editions of"Fitness Aerobics Standards".The writer has got some conclusions as follows:1. Generally speaking, the mass has a good feeling and evaluation about"Fitness Aerobics Standards"."Fitness Aerobics Standards"is more popularized in schools than in the mass, which has five main reasons as follows: lack of propaganda, lack of well organizers, lack of professional trainings and guides, lack of concern, support and relative competitions and lack of motivation.2. The mass has a lower understanding about the first version of"Fitness Aerobics Standards"than the second and the third, because it was popularized long time ago and the acts were underplayed. The second version is choreographied scientifically and artistically, well appreciated by the mass.3. The third version of"Fitness Aerobics Standards"has a different background and train of thought in choreography. The second and the third have a proper, ordered and better structure, with reasonable choreography in good matching for movement levels and musical design.4. The third version is more and more appreciated by the mass, because of the extensive and varied movement components and fashionable styles. However there are some inadequate places which can be improved, for instance, the music producing, difficulty levels of movements and the transitions from Level 1 to Level 6. It should be more sufficient in style and movement which can be choreographed according to different participants, in order to enlarge the scales of the mass and construct the mass to do the exercises and sports more scientifically and standardized.