The Treatment Of Clearing-Lung And Alleviating-cough In Community Acquired Pneumonia Cough With Clinical Observation

Objective:According to TCM theory,a collection of modern medicine, the understanding of community-acquired pneumonia cough, treatment of community acquired pneumonia cough, the clinical efficacy observed by clearing-lung and alleviating-cough.Methods:The research data show that the treatment group were cured, and significantly more efficient than the control group, P<0.05, but the total effective rate was no significant difference P>0.05. Improvement in cough symptoms, the treatment of the two treatment groups before and after the non-parametric test, P<0.01, control group, P<0.05, two groups of symptoms were improved, observation and treatment after integration, the treatment group improved than the control group. Cough, expectoration improvement of symptoms, the two groups, respectively, d value test derived P<0.01, significant difference between the treatment group than the control group. Cough the two groups to improve significantly the time difference (P<0.05) was statistically significant. The two groups expectoration improve the time difference, P<0.05, statistically significant. The treatment group to improve’the symptoms of cough, expectoration than the control group on the timeliness. Outcome measures symptoms have to improve the treatment of sweating, chest pain, fever, thirst, symptoms, treatment group significantly improved (P<0.01) indicators of symptoms observed in the control group improved (P<0.05or P<0.01). Integral comparison of two groups after treatment, P<0.01, indicating a statistically significant difference. Two sets of d values comparison (P<0.05or P <0.01), there are significant differences in the effect of the treatment group than the control group. In serum CRP, serum CRP level before treatment, P<0.01, statistically significant differences. Serum CRP levels in the control group before and after treatment, P<0.01, statistically significant differences. D value of the treatment group and control group comparison P<0.01,△of CRP are more significant differences. In terms of lung function airway resistance, the treatment group before and after treatment of total respiratory impedance improvement was more obvious, the total impedance of the control group breathing there was a marked change in the treatment group controls the contrast of the total respiratory impedance results before and after treatment (P<0.05) treatment group than the control group. Medication during the observation period, the treatment group, no adverse reactions. Control group, a small number of patients with mild nausea, stomach discomfort, diarrhea and other gastrointestinal symptoms, not addressed by their own mitigation, consistent with clinical reports. Discontinued in January, follow-up, patients treated with main outcome measure were not, generally in good condition. The control group,2patients remain mild cough, generally in good condition, no other discomfort, private prosecution can still endure, without medication.Conclusion:Studies have shown that the method of clearing-lung and alleviating-cough community-acquired pneumonia cough has a better therapeutic effect. Improve the symptoms of cough, expectoration, signs, and regulating inflammatory markers and improve the resistance of the airways has some advantages. This may be antibacterial, viral suppression enhanced tracheobronchial ciliary movement, the promotion of respiratory secretions excretion, and promote the formation of inflammatory barrier, scavenging oxygen free radicals and prevent the damage to the body endotoxin and Chinese medicine. Chinese medicine side effects, and can reduce the flora of drug resistance and adverse reactions to antibiotics, and adjust the patient’s immune function and improve clinical symptoms and improve patients’quality of life. Therefore, in the treatment of community acquired pneumonia cough in this area, the prospects for the development of Chinese medicine.