Yi-ology Of The Past20Years By Intelligence-based Research Paradigm

To academia to learn in the last20years showing a doubled thriving scene, Yi-ologyare no longer solely along the traditional academic path, but the formation of a newreticular pattern. Attendant by Paradigm to learn the history of philosophy has also beenbadly hit. Many scholars are in progress with yi-ology cure an innovative attempt toYi-ology academic achievement is also very rich. But equally there are many problems:First, Yi-ology governance innovation in many forms. Yi-ology path is no longerconfined to the traditional research model, is to try something new. To learn with avariety of disciplines such as cross-penetration, try a new way of thinking of architecture,a new interpretation of traditional Yi-ology, and so on. And innovation is certainly a goodtry, but the uneven academic achievement to learn the history of philosophy studiesdifficult. The second is Yi-ology the outcome of too rich, the majority of scholars not beable to deal with, absorb. A huge number of governance Yi-ology literature, will bring alot of difficulties, including the search literature, select the documents and to deal withliterature. This article is for a new attempt.Information science research method is the literature of a combination ofquantitative and qualitative research methods, processing literature a large amount ofresearch has a very large advantage. This article is trying to build a new paradigm-theparadigm of information science to solve two problems brought about by the yi-ologyheat. Information science paradigm is the efficiency of the information economyrequirements generated. Information science paradigm can effectively grasp the macroperspective of a large number of Yi-ology in the literature, the new century to learn thehistory of philosophy.The past20years to learn and study mainly in three aspects: using Yi-ology to say,history, history sect.