Social Capital Perspective Rural Disputes Governance

Today’s rural society is in a transition period of change and turmoil, and a variety of complicated contradictions and disputes in the original local social traditions and governance order has been changing. We reflect on the judicial disputes governance while more focus on non-complaint dispute resolution mechanism for the construction of renewed attention to look to the traditional authority of the gentry power and social capital an important role in the governance of rural disputes. Due to the unique connotation of the Chinese traditional concept of political organization, the traditional authority as a traditional Chinese feudal society in rural areas the existence of a specific governance power played a significant role in the old village governance. Traditional authority of its trust, following a varied, efficient management and operation characteristics of social capital in the governance of rural disputes. Studies have shown that the good governance of rural disputes rely on social capital in the village. Rural social capital and the balance of the villagers’sense of belonging, easier participation and cooperation of village disputes governance will have better results. The key factor to improve the governance of rural disputes and strive to foster rural social capital. Start from the discovery and change of traditional authority governance, and discusses the traditional authority and traditional rural social capital should become an important component of rural disputes governance today should be to tease out the traditional authority of the traditional governance model combined with the social capital paradigm to study. Due to the changing times, traditional authority, social capital is an inheritance and disappear, alienation and newborn, old and new fission. In recent years, countries have also recognized the need to strive to increase the society in general trust, reciprocity, and joint participation in social capital to create a good social foundation for a new socialist countryside construction. Around has set up a social court and other organizations of traditional authority governance model effective dispute management try. These traditional authority governance model for its close, cheap to run performance to resolve many of the judicial process are difficult to resolve disputes in mediation to resolve the civil contradictions and disputes in disputes acceptable, authoritative, and cheap, has great vitality. Finally, to lead to the organization of rural social capital to build the core of traditional authority, traditional authority to share fully in the country’s coercive power and credibility of the Security. Effective interaction and resource sharing between traditional authority and state power. But also to increase civic awareness and the ability of farmers to improve the awareness and ability of farmers to participate in collective affairs, shaping the effective running of the rural social capital endogenous, in order to better achieve the social management of rural areas.