| ã€Objectives】: We compared the sensibility and specificity of the following3criteria:theclassification criteria of American Rheumatism Association revised in1982ã€1997and2009,and discussed the diagnosis efficiency on each of them.ã€Methods】:278cases of SLE patients from Union Hospital of Fujian Medical Universityincluding135patients with SLE and143with non SLE used as control,were enrolled in thestudy. Their clinical and laboratory data that coincide with1982,1997and2009ACR-SLEclassifications were filled in each form.The results were analized by using SPSS17.0statisticalsoftware package.ã€Results】:1. Comparing the patients with SLE and non SLE patients, the difference in theskin lesionsã€Oral ulcersã€Nonscarring alopeciaã€Serositisã€Renal disorderã€Hematologic disorder(Leukopenia)〠ANA〠anti-ds-DNA〠anti-Sm〠Antiphospholipid antibodies and Lowcomplement had statistical significance (P<0.05). But the difference in Synovitis\Inflammatory synovitisã€Neurologic disorder had no statistical significance (P>0.05).2. The sensitivity of the1982ã€1997and2009ACR criteria were86.67%ã€86.67%ã€97.78%(P=0.002);the specificity were95.80%ã€95.80%ã€88.81%respectively (P=0.022),showing thatthe2009criteria had greater sensitivity but lower specificity by contrast while the1997ã€1982ACR criteria come out to have same sensitivity and specificity.In terms of accuracy, the threeclassifications were91.37%ã€91.37%ã€93.17%respectively,showing no statistical significance(P=0.666).3.When tracing rheumatic diseases (except SLE)as control group(n=113), specificity ofthe three classifications were96.46%ã€96.46%ã€91.15%,showing no statistical significancebetween them (P>0.05). The accuracy of the three classifications were91.02%ã€91.02%ã€94.69%,with no statistical significance difference (P>0.05).ã€Conclusions】:The sensitivity of the2009clssification was higher,but specificity was lowerwhich compared to those of ACR-SLE classification revised in1982and in1997.There were no statistical significance in accuracy among three classifications. |