Objective:Nowadays, it is widely recognized that COPD is a complex syndromecharacterized by numerous pulmonary and extrapulmonary manifestations. As a result,there is consensus that FEV1by itself does not adequately describe the complexity ofthe disease and that FEV1cannot be used in isolation for the optimal diagnosis,assessment, and management of the disease.Methods:COPD subjects recruited in the second affiliated hospital. Principalcomponent analysis (PCA) was performed using eight variablesselected for theirrelevance to COPD: age, cumulative smoking, forced expiratory volume in1s(FEV1)(%predicted), dyspnoea (modified Medical ResearchCouncil scale), comorbidities,IL-8,IL-32,TNF-α. Patient classification was performed using clusteranalysis basedon PCA-transformed data.Results:124COPD subjects were analysed:77.4%were male; median (interquartilerange) age was72.0(64.0–73.75) yrs; FEV1was38.04(34.1–66.3)%pred; and10,28,34and52subjects were classified in Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive LungDisease (GOLD) stages1,2,3and4,respectively. PCA showed that threeindependent components accounted for73.1%of variance.PCA-based cluster analysisresulted in the classification of subjects into four clinical phenotypes。Conclusion:1ã€Using principal component analysis and cluster analysis may be able to identify theclinical phenotype that could not be identified by GOLD classification.2ã€Subjects with comparable airflow limitation (FEV1) belonged to differentphenotypes and had marked differences in smoking index,symptoms, comorbidities。... |