Clinical Obskrvation On Dysarthria Of Supranuclear Paralysis Treated By Tri-tongue-acu With Brain-activating And Orifice-opening Acupuncture

Objective:Objective evaluation of two different treatment methods (tri-tongue-acu withbrain-activating and orifice-opening acupuncture/conventional acupuncture)on theeffect of dysarthria of supranuclear paralysis. Discuss the clinical validity andpracticality of tri-tongue-acus with brain-activating and orifice-opening acupuncturetherapy treating dysarthria of supranuclear paralysis.Methods:60patients with qualified subjects were randomly divided into two groups, theresearch group was given tri-tongue-acus with brain-activating and orifice-openingacupuncture therapy; Control group was given conventional acupuncture therapy. Aperiod of treatment was14days, a total was two periods. Observe the treatment ofdysarthria symptom, score of Frenchay assessment scale before treatment, treatmentafter a period and after treatment. Compare two groups low shear blood viscosity andPV before treatment and after all treatments.Results:①After a period of treatment and after all treatment, Frenchay assessment scalescores of two groups were be higher (P <0.01) than before. And after a period oftreatment the research scores was higher than the control group scores. But after alltreatments the research group and control group comparison had no significantdifference (P>0.05);②On hemorheology, after all treatments the two groups’ indexes of high and lowshear blood viscosity were lower (P <0.01) than before, and the indexes of researchwas lower (P <0.05) than the control group. After all treatments the two groups’indexes of PV were lower (P <0.05) than before, but the research group and controlgroup comparison had no significant difference (P>0.05);③After a period of treatment, compare clinical curative effect between the research group and control group. The total effective rate of research group on clinicalcurative effect was70%, the total effective rate of control group was40%. Two groupsof curative effect comparison of curative effect difference were statistically significant(P <0.05). The result shows that after a period of treatment, the clinical efficacy ofresearch group was obviously superior to control group. After all the treatment, the totaleffective rate of the research group was100%, and the total effective rate of thecontrol group was73%. Compare clinical curative effect between two groups, therewere no statistically significant difference (P>0.05). the result showed that the twogroups’ clinical curative effect were similar. After all the treatment, the cure rate ofthe research group was36.6%, and the control group was20%. Compare two groups,there was statistically significant difference (P <0.05). the result showed that cure rateof the research group was better than that of the control group.Conclusion:①Both tri-tongue-acus with brain-activating and orifice-opening acupuncturetherapy (research group)and conventional acupuncture therapy (control group) havegood clinical efficacy in treating dysarthria of supranuclear paralysis.②Tri-tongue-acus with brain-activating and orifice-opening acupuncture therapyworks faster, is better than conventional acupuncture in improving dysarthria ofsupranuclear paralysis and faster effect, better curative effect.②Tri-tongue-acus with brain-activating and orifice-opening acupuncture havegood clinical efficacy in treating dysarthria of supranuclear paralysis, it has faster effect,better curative effect and less effect, it is worth to research and extend.