| Research purpose Observe and study the differences of curative effects between using acupuncture with TianmaGouteng drink and usingTianmaGouteng drink only.Research methods Using randomized,comparison, singleblind,distributed completely hidden research methods to divide 100 patients into the experimental group and the comparison group,50 cases in each. Use acupuncture and TianmaGouteng drink on the experimental group. Acupuncture and take the side of the sun, silk foot fully empty rate outside the valley, wind pool, clearance, spiderman creek, inter-row, too creek, keeping needles for 30 minutes a time,7 days of treatment during a period (operate acunpunture 6 days in a row, with 1 day rest), at the same time, the daily water decoction TianmaGouteng drink a dose,150 ml, morning and evening temperature.7 for a period of treatment, needle medicine four courses of treatment. The control group given TianmaGouteng drink a single treatment, the decoction methods and treatment with the experimental group. Respectively to observe the two groups integrally, both two periods of treatment of Migraine symptoms, Visual analog Scale score (Visual Analogue Scale, referred to as "VAS"), Migraine Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (the Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire Verision2.1, MSQ), compare the two groups if they had any differences, in order to evaluate the curative effects.Research results By baseline data comparison of two groups of patients:gender, age, course of the disease, migraine patients with type, headache parts, such as general data by statistical analysis, there were no statistical differences, comparable between groups; Special migraine headache symptom scale (number of headache, headache, symptoms) duration, with headache, visual analogue scale (VAS), the specific quality of life questionnaire in the treatment of migraine patients before the statistical analysis, no significant effects were found between two groups.After treatment, two groups of patients in the number of headache, headache, headache duration and accompanying symptoms integral comparison in the group, P < 0.01, obviously there is some significant difference, think two groups of treatment all can improve the symptoms of patients with headache, compare the two groups later, P< 0.01, considering the experimental treatment in improving the number of patients with headache, headache, headache duration and accompanying symptoms were better than that in control group treatment plan.In improving TCM symptoms:with migraine, two groups of patients of the control group in clinical cure rate was 19.15%, the efficiency was 46.81%, effective rate was 23.40%; Experimental clinical cure rate was 27.08%, the efficiency was 43.75%, effective rate was 16.67%, total effectiveness of control group was 89.36%, the experimental group the total effective rate was 87.5%, two groups of total curative effect level difference is compared, the X2 test, X2= 0.80, P= 0.777 (> 0.05), no significant difference could be found prompt treatment the two groups in curative effect close to improve TCM symptoms situation, two methods of treatment have good curative effect.On two groups of patients with migraine specific quality of life questionnaire (the dimension scores before and after treatment are compared, and their treatment, two groups of patients in the field of functional limitations, dysfunction, comparison on differences in the field of emotion enjoys statistical significance obviously, P< 0.01, thought that the experimental group and control group treatment all can improve the function of patients with restricted areas, areas of dysfunction, emotional three dimension score; Comparison between two groups of patients after treatment groups, in the field of functional limitations and emotion in the field of comparison, difference have statistical significance, prompt the experimental group in the field and improve the function of patients with limited emotional area, curative effect is better than the control group. And in the field of dysfunction, score no statistical difference between the groups.On two groups of patients with migraine with visual analogue scale (VAS), after treatment, two groups of patients before and after their VAS within the group of comparison, the t test, P< 0.01, suggesting two treatment methods can improve the level of patients with migraine headache; After treatment in patients with headache degree of group comparison between t= 12.37, P< 0.01, the difference is statistically significant that the experimental group in improving the degree of headache patients compared with the observation group has better curative effect, Clinical total curative effect of two groups of patients with migraine headache, the control group after treatment of clinical healing rate was 23.40%, the efficiency was 44.68%, effective rate was 17.02%; Experimental clinical cure rate was 27.08%, the efficiency was 43.75%, effective rate was 20.83%, and total effective rate of control group was 85.1, the experimental group the total effective rate was 89.58%, two groups of total curative effect level difference is compared, the X2 test, X2= 0.11, P = 0.740 (> 0.05), two groups of patients in the total curative effect comparison of headache, no significant difference could be found, prompt approximates to two groups of curative effect to improve headache, two methods of treatment have good curative effect.Research conclusions By comparing the experimental group and control group, VAS, TCM syndrome data, the results shows that, two kinds of treatment methods can both improve the symptoms of migraine, the degree of headache, quality of life, the respect such as TCM symptoms all have good curative effect, but with TianmaGouteng drink of acupuncture therapy in improving the degree of headache, headache, accompanied by symptoms, shorten the duration of headache and improve the function of the quality of life in patients with restricted areas and emotion on two dimensions were superior to pure oral treatment of TianmaGouteng drink. |
PDF Full Text Request