The Clinical Study Of Fire Moxibustion On Temperature-sensitive Acupoint On The Patient Suffering From Cold Stasis Type Cervical Spondylosis

[Objective] Through clinical research system,To observe the intervention effect of thunder fire moxibustion heat sensitive acupoints on patients with cold stasis type cervical spondylosis and adverse reaction.Evaluate its safety and effectiveness.Analysis and discussion of its mechanism.Provide the basis for the clinical selection of effective intervention program.[Methods] In this study,90 patients were randomly divided into two groups according to the order of the group.Control group and experimental group of 45 cases.Two groups were carried out on the basis of treatment (acupuncture therapy),The control group was treated with moxibustion experience points,The experimental group was given ray fire heat sensitive point treatment.1 times a day, continuous treatment for 5 days.Observation of two groups of patients with VAS, NPQ, cervical activity index to judge the efficacy.[Results]1、Baseline comparison:The gender, age, degree of education and course of disease of the two groups were compared,Statistical analysis showed no significant difference(P>0.05),The baseline levels of the two groups were consistent, and the cases were comparable.2、Total effective comparisonrThe experimental group intervention of neck type cervical spondylosis cold resistance network,26 cases were cured(57.78%),improved in 19 cases(42.22%),total efficiency of 100%; Control group cur were cured 17 cases(37.78%), improved in 24 cases(53.33%),4 cases (8.89%) The total efficiency of 91.11%.It is showed that the clinical effect of the heat sensitive acupoint group is better than that of moxibustion group.3、Degree of pain comparison:Before intervention, the experimental group VAS Rating:5.82±0.44, control group VAS Rating:5.66±0.52, comparable(P>0.05).After the intervention, the experimental group VAS Rating:0.21±0.41, control group VAS Rating:0.51±0.69.Two groups of intervention patients VAS scores have improved, before and after comparison with a statistically significant(P <0.01).A month later, the experimental group VAS Rating:0.04±0.21, control group VAS Rating: 0.22±0.42, VAS score between the two groups was statistically significant(P<0.05).The results show: the experimental group intervention cold Obstruction cervical syndrome, VAS score immediate and long-term efficacy than the control group.4、Daily life influence comparison:Experimental group NPQ score:41.64±3.09, control group NPQ score:41.75±3.14, comparable(P>0.05).After the intervention, the experimental group NPQ score: 15.24±1.73, control group NPQ score:16.06±1.68, with a difference in efficacy before and after the intervention was statistically significant(P<0.01),NPQ scores between the two groups was statistically significant(P<0.05).A month later, the experimental group NPQ score:18.84±2.73, control group NPQ score:21.51±2.41, NPQ scores between the two groups was statistically significant(P<0.01).Description two interventions have effect, but the experimental group in reducing pain in the neck impact on everyday life than the control group.5、Comparison of cervical spine mobility:Before intervention, the experimental group flexion range of 63.17±4.78, scoliosis range 83.97±3.25, swivel range 109.20±4.07; control group, flexion and extension range of 63.37±4.70, scoliosis range 83.84±3.02, swivel range 109.28±5.34, comparable between the two groups(P>0.05).After intervention, the experimental group flexion range of 88.02± 3.27, scoliosis range 86.41±3.05, swivel range 153.55±4.28; control group, flexion and extension range of 83.82±5.95, scoliosis range 85.21±2.52, swivel range 151.55±4.28,Description two interventions have good results.Compare, flexion and extension range has statistically significant(P <0.01).between the two groups, the range of lateral bending, rotation range were statistically significant(P<0.05).Range of flexion and extension of the experimental group before and after intervention was 24.84±5.47,The difference of the range of flexion and extension in the control group was 20.44+5.65;The difference of the lateral bending range of the experimental group was 2.42+3.39,The difference of the lateral bending range of the control group was 1.35+3.11;The rotation range of the test group was 44.35+4.99,The difference of the rotation range of the control group was 42.26+5.82.The results show:The difference between the two groups of cervical mobility group comparison, the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05),for the side bending and rotation range, although the experimental group has the advantage but no statistical difference (P>0.05).[Conclusions] Thunder fire moxibustion and moxibustion acupuncture intervention heat sensitive acupoints experience cold obstruction syndrome of patients with cervical spondylosis,Has a good clinical efficacy.Comparison of two groups of moxibustion,The general therapeutic effect of thunder fire moxibustion heat sensitive acupoints is better than moxibustion experience points,Not only in the short term can significantly improve the symptoms of neck pain,Cervical vertebra activity.But also it has a good continued effect on the improvement of neck pain.